Julian Real Doesn't Know Shit From Chocolate Pudding

Here is an article from The Sydney Morning Herald dated May 31st, 2006:

Dutch pedophiles are launching a political party to push for a cut in the legal age for sexual relations to 12 from 16 and the legalisation of child pornography and sex with animals, sparking widespread outrage.

The Charity, Freedom and Diversity (NVD) party said on its web site it would be officially registered today, proclaiming: "We are going to shake The Hague awake!"

The party said it wanted to cut the legal age for sexual relations to 12 and eventually scrap the limit altogether.

"A ban just makes children curious," Ad van den Berg, one of the party's founders, told the Algemeen Dagblad newspaper.

"We want to make pedophilia the subject of discussion," he said, adding the subject had been a taboo since the 1996 Marc Dutroux child abuse scandal in neighbouring Belgium.

"We want to get into parliament so we have a voice. Other politicians only talk about us in a negative sense, as if we were criminals," Van den Berg told Reuters.

The Netherlands, which already has liberal policies on soft drugs, prostitution and gay marriage, was shocked by the plan.

An opinion poll published today showed that 82 per cent wanted the government to do something to stop the new party, while 67 per cent said promoting pedophilia should be illegal.

"They make out as if they want more rights for children. But their position that children should be allowed sexual contact from age 12 is of course just in their own interest," anti-pedophile campaigner Ireen van Engelen told the AD daily.

Right-wing lawmaker Geert Wilders said he had asked the government to investigate whether a party with such "sick ideas" could really be established, ANP news agency reported.

Kees van deer Staaij, a member of the Christian SGP party, also demanded action: "Pedophilia and child pornography should be taboo in every constitutional state. Breaking that will just create more victims and more serious ones."

The party wants private possession of child pornography to be allowed although it supports the ban on the trade of such materials. It also supports allowing pornography to be broadcast on daytime television, with only violent pornography limited to the late evening.

Toddlers should be given sex education and youths aged 16 and up should be allowed to appear in pornographic films and prostitute themselves. Sex with animals should be allowed although abuse of animals should remain illegal, the NVD said.

The party also said everybody should be allowed to go naked in public and promotes legalising all soft and hard drugs and free train travel for all.

This very same article was copied and pasted on Julian Real's A Radical Profeminist blog. under the new headline: "Dutch Men's Rights Group wanted to rape children without consequence to the men."

Now this was an obvious attempt by Julian to confuse his readers into thinking the Pedophile Party was an actual Men's Rights group. A petty smear campaign tactic if you ask me. Real Mens' Rights groups have nothing to do with the rights of pedophiles. This comes as no surprise to me, that Julian Real would pull a stunt like this because, this is after all, the same guy who stalked me after I left a comment on another one of his idiotic blogs -- finding a MySpace page of mine and copying and pasting that in an effort to shame me. It didn't work, it only made him look like a bigger loser. Check out my previous blog: 'I'm Being Stalked By A Radical Profeminist.'

Men’s rights are the freedoms inherently possessed by men and boys of all ages, which may be institutionalized, ignored or suppressed by law, custom, and behavior in a particular society. The term may also refer to an activist movement advancing these rights. Supporters of men's rights aim to promote the physical, economic and emotional well-being of all men and boys, viewing this as part of human rights, civil rights, or equal rights. They are particularly concerned with issues involving family life such as family law, child custody, paternity fraud, and domestic violence. There is no single unifying manifesto or organization which can claim to speak for the entire movement and the term is used in various ways.

Related areas of the men's movement include:

Fathers' rights focus on the relationship between fathers and their children and in particular family law.

Masculism provides a counterpart to feminism and argues against legal constructs, reforms, or entitlements which deny men equal rights under the law on the basis of gender; there are conservative "traditionalist", "liberal", and libertarian strands.

Someone like Julian Real, who undoubtably suffers from a form of chemical imbalance, can't make a distinction between groups such as

a.) NAMBLA - North American Man/Boy Love Association: a New York City and San Francisco-based unincorporated organization in the United States that advocates the liberalisation of laws against sexual relations between adult and minor males - resolving to "end the oppression of men and boys who have freely chosen mutually consenting relationships".

or

b.) Fathers 4 Justice: a movement whose members are primarily interested in issues related to family law, including child custody and child support that affect fathers and their children.

To put the two groups in the same leauge as each other is frankly quite insulting, further proof that Julian Real doesn't know shit from chocolate pudding.