Blog of Shangi - The Mad Musings of the MadShangi

The Owner of Guru Gossip Blog Is a Dumb Cunt

2010-02-02T20:29:00.000-08:00

Some people really are retarded. Retarded is an understatement when it comes to describing the human waste that is the owner of http://gurugossip.blogspot.com - a blog devoted to whining about Gurus on YouTube. Oh boo-hoo, you fucking child. What did the gurus ever do to you? Don't hate just 'cause yo ugly.

Here is an example of the kind of dumb-ass posts you'll be likely to find on GuruGossip:

Msfililocalola aka Msfili aka Ashlee Abella - update
So, I got an email from a supposed "real" friend of Ashlee Abella correcting me on the whole welfare thing. She's not on welfare. Her and her family actually have numerous foster children that they collect money for. This is why Ashlee will often refer to Friday as payday. That's the day she collects the cheque that is meant to be spent on the foster kids. That's class personified!!

FYI--- Torok, stickylipglossx and juicytuesday28 have no involvment in what I post on this blog. I post what I want to post and that's the end of the story. The email I got did NOT come from juicytuesday28 or stickylipglossx. If Msfili weren't guilty of something, she would have had no reason to go all psycho and delete her YouTube stuff. Use your heads, darlings.

Um, stalk much, bitch? Maybe you should get a real life instead of getting stuck on reporting on the lives of others? Don't you have "Gossip Girl" reruns to watch? Wasn't the new "Twilight" movies playing in your area? I'm assuming you're some teen bitch, 'cause who else could be that dumb and vaccuous?

I also read this little gem in the comments section:

GuruGossiper said...
If you want to report her, here's the info. Got this emailed to me from someone.

Foster Care Services
222 Provencher Boulevard
Winnipeg MB R2H 0G5
Phone: 944-4288
Fax: 944-4666 or 944-4503

(NAME AND ADDRESS REMOVED BY
SHANGI)

For the person that claims that fostering is a job.... wrong. Fostering is a service that you volunteer to do because you want to help children in need. It doesn't matter where you live. The money provided by the government to foster parents is meant to be spent on the costs of providing for the foster children. It's not a pay cheque.

You are beyond sad. Posting someone's info like that? That's beyond sad.

TO REPORT THIS BITCH: http://www.google.com/support/blogger/bin/request.py?page=main_tos&blog_ID=4453912724191002717&blog_URL=http://gurugossiper.blogspot.com/

What if chat rooms were real?

2009-08-24T18:31:00.001-07:00

Great short film! I saw this one awhile back and I thought it was hysterical. Oh god, Jerry is so me! Ha! Ha! Ha! Schizo is definitely Graeme Stephen Tucker. Uh oh, here come the cops 'cause he's been red flagged again by the mean, horrible, nasty Pathetic YouTube Stafff! Muhahahahahahaha!

Facebook Threats Woman Detained

2009-08-22T08:44:00.001-07:00

Facebook threats woman detained

A teenager has been detained for three months in a young offenders' institution for harassing a woman on social networking website Facebook.

Keeley Houghton swore at and threatened Emily Moore in person and on the internet in July, Worcester Magistrates' Court heard.

The 18-year-old of Elgar Avenue, in Malvern, Worcestershire, admitted a charge of harassment on 31 July.

She was also given a five-year restraining order.

Houghton is prohibited from contacting Ms Moore, or commenting about her on any social networking system or website during that time.

'Tackle bullying'

Emma-Jane Cross, chief executive of charity Beatbullying, said the sentencing was the first of its kind in the UK.

She said although cyber-bullying is increasing, the government, networking sites like Facebook and charities should work together to tackle the problem of bullying generally.

"Today's sentencing of an 18-year-old girl for cyber-bullying is the first of its kind in the UK and sets an important precedent," she said.

"Cyber-bullying is a worrying and fast-growing trend which can be more harmful than typical schoolyard bullying.

"However, the solution is not to limit young people's internet access and phone usage.

"Instead, social networking sites like Facebook, along with the Government and charities like Beatbullying, must work together to tackle the real root of the problem - the bullying itself."

Graeme Stephen Tucker Is A Cyberstalker from New Zealand

2009-08-21T08:37:00.000-07:00

Listen up, Shangi Fans! The MadShangi is under attack. Many moons ago, I made a video called "MadShangi Defends ChristianU2uber" which gained a little bit of attention on YouTube. That's when I came in contact with Graeme Stephen Tucker, age 51 - who shall forever be known as The Cyberstalker. The Cyberstalker first responded to "MadShangi Defends ChristianU2uber" from his XXYZGUY channel and I subscribed to him. But then, he started sending me these "other" videos from another channel. These videos were a smear fest against a man I have never met before: his name is Gavan Coleman. And the channel was colemansasod (now defunct). Gavan Coleman's YouTube channel is PeaceAndParty check it out.

I was wrong to call Julian Real a stalker, because Julian Real was just another pussy ass quiter. This guy was the true cyberstalker, I would come to learn that The Cyberstalker had been attacking this Gavan Coleman for months and months. He found out where the guy went to school and posted a link to the school's website underneath: "Where Gavan Went To School." He contacted his family members trying to pump them for information about their son, he had been contacting his subscribers spreading slander everywhere, trying to enlist complete strangers in his campaign of hate against Gavan. Strangers like me, The MadShangi. It didn't take long for me to see past his nice guy fascade he put on with me, and when I learned the truth about this guy. I spoke out against him in a video: "My Final Thoughts On Graeme Stephen Tucker He also hates a fella named Nicky ("Kamododragoon" on YouTube, an intersex man with Kallman's Syndrome who has strong beliefs about trans and intersex being two separate communities. The Cyberstalker calls him "Nicky the Bigot" and even posted showing his address, phone number, pictures of him, his house. While The Cyberstalker denies any involvement with that video, now removed from YouTube, those who have seen this video know it was the work of the Cyberstalker: who else would put "Don't Fuck With Graeme Tucker" in the video?

Interesting enough, The Cyberstalker's latest video is about the red flagging about one of my videos: "Fuck Feministing: The FuckYouTube Edition"

Catching Up

2009-08-21T08:32:00.000-07:00

Sorry to my loyal 3 followers of the Shangi Blog. I have been very busy with my YouTube channel. I've been dealing with my channels getting flagged, getting sucked into a mindless YouTube flame war with a cyberstalker, one account annihilated, one left crippled, and my new one themadshangichannel getting flagged already. The video in question is my latest opus, "Fuck Feministing." Dedicated to all the bitches there.

MadShangi on Poser Lesbian Bullshit or Jessica Valenti on "The Colbert Report"

2009-03-21T09:07:00.000-07:00

Admitedly I don't really have an axe to grind or much interest in Jessica Valenti, but I've seen some videos from her - and read a little bit of Feministing.com. It's some boring shit. But I found her comments pretty interesting considering the photos you see here in the video. This is Jessica Valenti on The Colbert Report whoring her book "Full Frontal Feminism."

Time for a crackdown on women who dress in sexually provocative clothes

2009-03-21T08:42:00.000-07:00

Thugtician leads the charge against female on male sexual harassement.

Honours for this video (11)

Ratings: 55

Favourited: 17 times

#42 - Most Discussed (Today)
#10 - Most Discussed (Today) - People & Blogs
#97 - Most Discussed (Today) - People & Blogs - Global
#30 - Most Discussed (This Week) - People & Blogs
#63 - Most Responded (Today) - People & Blogs
#100 - Most Responded (This Week) - People & Blogs
#12 - Top Favourited (Today) - People & Blogs
#85 - Top Favourited (This Week) - People & Blogs
#67 - Top Rated (Today)
#13 - Top Rated (Today) - People & Blogs
#32 - Top Rated (This Week) - People & Blogs

RE:

Divorce: Men Wealthy, Women Poor? I Think Not, Daily Mail!

2009-03-21T08:33:00.000-07:00

A look at a piece of propoganda found in the Daily Mail, a British newspaper. The article claims that women are left struggling after divorce, while men are wealthier. We will come to see that it is complete rubbish, and examine the ways statistics were misread and skewed for the purposes' of the authors' agenda.

For the Original Daily Mail Article: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/artic...

For a more elaborate breaking down of the Daily Mail article. Go to FeckBlog.
http://feck-blog.blogspot.com/2009/01...

and

http://feck-blog.blogspot.com/2009/02...

There is a section in the video where the sound cuts out. Sorry for the inconvenience there. Please be patient, for the sound comes back on. It's just too bad that we miss out on the little bit that's lost due to the sound malfunction.

Oprah says, "1 in 3 Men Cheat" Huffington Post says "1 in 3 Married Moms Cheat"

2009-03-20T20:36:00.000-07:00

The Sensitivity of the Vulva - Hysterical Reactions from Feminazis.

2009-03-20T20:34:00.000-07:00

RE:

Inspired by the hilarious comments I read about the above video, I decided to post a response video of me reading the more ridiculous comments on YouTube.

The Reproducton Rights of Men

2009-03-20T20:30:00.000-07:00

FEMINISM... You been played

2009-03-20T19:58:00.000-07:00

JERNIGANSIX

Feminism has misled many women into thinking they were being granted equality when all the while they were being stripped of their families...

RE:

If You Don't Like What I Have To Say...

2009-03-20T19:50:00.000-07:00

This was a response to a letter I got from a girl from Ireland who didn't like that I responded positively to Thugtician's "Delusional Women" video. So I'm politely telling her to go fuck herself. In her letter, before she gets into details of her personal life that I don't give a rat's ass about - moaning on about how I can't speak my mind about man stuff because she's had a terrible boyfriend -- she writes "I know I shouldn't bore you with the details of my personal life but I feel fucking compelled to.." Oh! A woman that feels compelled to tell a complete stranger details about her personal life! That's unheard of! Everyone wanna complain about their boyfriends to the Shangster, like he give a shit. Blow me.

Ireland Woman Jailed for Incest, Child Abuse

2009-03-20T19:41:00.000-07:00

BBC personality made 40 false rape allegations against her ex-boyfriend

2009-03-20T19:30:00.000-07:00

For the Full Story click here!

RE: Delusional Women

2009-03-20T19:13:00.000-07:00

RE:

Man Who Didn't Father Twins Is Forced To Pay Child Support

2009-03-20T18:36:00.000-07:00

<

An Irish woman who forced a teenage son to have sex with her and abused and starved her other five children in a rat-infested bungalow has been jailed for seven years. The teenager was forced to have sex with his mother, now aged 40, on four occasions over a six-year period, the Irish Independent newspaper said. The woman from central Ireland admitted to police her children now aged between 10 and 19 were often blue with cold, had dinner only twice a week and had lice crawling over their bodies. "It was a house of horrors with bells on," the mother, who was not named in order to protect the identity of the children, was quoted as saying by several Irish newspapers. "I can safely say that I was the worst mother in the world and I'd turn back the clock if I could, but I can't," she said. The woman was given 7 years and concurrent sentences of 6 years on counts of carnal knowledge, incest and wilful neglect, Ireland's Courts Service said in a statement. Judge Miriam Reynolds said she would have given the woman a life sentence had she been a man, but the maximum sentence for women in such cases was seven years, the Irish Times newspaper reported on its website. The woman is believed to be the first female convicted of incest in Ireland. Austria shocked the world last year with what media dubbed the "house of horrors" case of Josef Fritzl, who imprisoned his daughter in a cellar for 24 years and fathered seven children by her. Fritzl will go on trial on March 16 on charges including the murder of one of their children. The Irish woman from the central county of Roscommon admitted a total of 10 charges including incest, sexual abuse, neglect and ill-treatment. The teenage son who was forced to have sex with her was quoted as saying by the irish Independent: "I was crying. She was my mother. Why did she do that to me?". The children, who were moved to foster care in 2004, told healthcare workers their mother regularly left them on their own before coming home drunk around 3-4 a.m and arguing incoherently with them. A police investigation began in 2005 after the eldest child revealed details of the abuse to Health Board staff. One daughter said nits used to crawl down her face and their mother forbade her and her sister from tying up their hair because they would become too obvious, the Independent said. "Mammy didn't take care of us right," one child said.

Source: http://www.stuff.co.nz/

Feminists Try To Shut Down MenAreBetterThanWomen.com

2009-03-20T18:25:00.000-07:00

Wow! I Have Two Followers Again...

2009-03-20T18:23:00.000-07:00

Well, that's good because now this blog is going through a major overhaul. Instead of letting this thing sit here and rot. The Shangster is now making this part of a new website being developed. So stay tuned for that. Now. I will be catching up on things by posting my latest videos.

Should I Even Bother With This Blog?

2009-02-11T13:37:00.000-08:00

Hey there, Shangi Fans. Well, I only have one Shangi fan, because I only have one follower. Ha ha. I have been very busy lately, and haven't had much time to blog. Also, it just seems like a wasted effort since no one really reads it anyway. I've been spending most of my time on my YouTube channel that's getting more subscribers than I ever did with this blog.

http://www.youtube.com/user/MadShangi

Yahoo Answers: "How Does It Feel To Kill Someone?"

2009-01-07T17:10:00.000-08:00

From a user named ZepherGeist

I found out the M4 carbine and M855 5.56x45mm cartridge is not nearly as effective as it should be.

Later, since I was Company Armorer and near adopted son, I asked a harmless favor from the First Sergeant.

I got an M16A2. A Belgian one, my "FN16".

I honestly NEVER thought that I would WANT an M16, but I am convinced that the fact I had a rifle - with a purchased C-More reflector sight - is the reason I survived my first combat tour from March 2003 - April 2004.

As for what I felt?

In all honesty . . . I really felt surprisingly little. With the exception that "The weapon is NOT working".

Turns out every round I fired at the Haji hit . . . and went THROUGH him.

It was around thirty meters when I first fired. Initially six entry wounds and six exit wounds, after the third controlled pair, I dropped to a knee and put a round through his right hip bone, which dropped him immediately. Then I rushed up and shot him in the head.

I never thought a human being could produce a scream like that.

I did not even have to make the justification of "Him or Me", I just felt numb. Nothing of note for any of the individuals I shot at. The fact I was numb was more frightening.

Except for that scream.

It stays with me. Comes out every now and again during the night, but I don't even remember the bastard's face, just the scream.

The CO, 1SG and Chaplain helped me figure out that it was not my inner sociopath screaming to get out, but it was more that I had a higher maturity level - I was an "Old Man" at 26 at the time - and I was better prepared to not dwell on it.

Able to compartmentalize, as we say.

In combat I felt real anxiety, yet in many ways felt cold and detached from it all.

Quite surreal compared to the stories of other men.

You don't get smarter, you just get older by one more day.

Until the next mission, then you do it all over again. There is no *********, because you know you are not bulletproof.

For me there was just detached focus as I looked for a fight.

I had an M14 rifle in my tool box my second time in.

The guy I popped with that found out how good a shot I was, as I hit him just below his left eye. My other 1SG, who had ordered me to fire, was impressed. The M118 sniper round is a real argument winner.

He gave me a dollar he bet with the CO, who I knew from my last duty station and was picked by him for his radioman and part of his Personal Security Detachment, that I would nail the enemy in the head.

To balance my Karma, I gave the 1SG an ice-cold Coca-Cola when we finally got back to the FOB.

We were both relieved the Fates had been satisfied.

The one thing I AM afraid of is talking to people about it in person.

I wound up making some people uncomfortable the only time I did. And I am leery of speaking to people at the VA, as I cannot account for true confidentiality there.

The LAST thing I need is for my name to pop up on a "Banned from ownership" list when I go to purchase a rifle or pistol.

I did not fight for this country just to be DENIED my rights.

A New Direction For The Blog of Shangi

2009-01-07T16:27:00.000-08:00

Shangi here. I know I have been slagging off on the quality of posts lately here had the Shangi Blog. That would probably explain why I have gone from two 2 followers to just 1 follower.

Either I need to start advertizing better, or I just should get off my lazy ass and put some fresh meat into this dead horse.

I was hoping to have an interview posted on my blog based on a conversation I had with a woman who liked my "Fuck the Feminists" song/rant/rap whatever you call it. Ha ha. She was a woman who served in the military, and agree with some of the points I made. And her insights were surprising and interesting.

An excerpt from an e-mail she sent me.

But: here’s a little background: spent close to 12 yrs in the Army, women are treated differently and in my opinion the military should go back to the way it was back in the 70s, women should be separated from the men and kept that way. (Women were in what was called the Women’s Army Corps or WAC)

She had more to say, but sadly I lost touch with her. That would sure have been a damn good post. But fuck. Whatever. I need a new direction to draw more Shangi fans, or just kill the fucking thing. So here's what I have in store for upcoming posts.

SHANGI'S FAVORITE MOVIES

Movie reviews written by yours truly.

David Cronenberg's kickass remake of The Fly,

Taxi Driver directed by Martin Scorsese and starring the awesome Robert De Niro

The Rocky Horror Picture Show directed by Jim Sharman starring Tim Curry, Susan Sarandon, Barry Bostwick (The mayor from "Spin City")

Pokemon: The 1st Movie: Mewtwo Strikes Back (Holy shit! You don't wanna fuck with Mewtwo)

John Water's PINK FLAMINGOS (Spoiler warning: he eats dog shit at the end.)

And I dunno... maybe to draw in teeny boppers, I will post my interview with Lindsay Lohan's pussy.

Guess What?! Fuck Christmas!

2008-12-25T16:24:00.000-08:00

Shangi here, wishing you all a Happy Holiday. Whatever holiday you foolish theists are celebrating today. I'm here to spread the Holiday Hate. You know, a teacher once accused me of being an anarchist. Maybe she's right. But I'm also right when I say she was a fucking cunt working for The Man. And The Man ain't cool. So MadShangi says "fuck Christmas."

Not too long ago I deleted a girl off my Facebook. My MSN. I threw away her phone number. But she phoned me today to tell me she was thinking of me. On Christmas. I wanted to die. I told her I'd call her back. I'm not going to. Why? Because right now I'm writing this blog. And to me, that's a better thing to do with my timre right now.

So after I picked myself off of the floor, I crawled over to my chair, sat down and logged into my blog. Why? I don't know why. Maybe I'm a mean guy. Maybe I'm a pretty nasty shit. Maybe I'm such a horrible person everyone is always telling me I am. I'm feeling like a Scrooge this Holiday Season, and I just want to say "Bah Hambug and Fuck You"

There is no Santa, kids. That was your mommy and daddy all along, and when they're gone who's going to give you your presents? NO ONE! Anyone reading this blog right now better copy and paste this and send it to the local authorities. Because I'm issuing a threat. A threat against Christmas. Fuck Christmas and Fuck The Christmas Spirit, Fuck Rudolph The Red Nose Reindeer. Anyone that worships the false gods Jesus, Jehova, or Santa I'm going to send anthrax to their houses through the mail. Maybe. Could this be satire? You decide!

Maybe I have designs on being the Andy Kauffman of the Blogger Sphere. Maybe I just hate your fucking guts. Why am I being so nasty? I like being nasty. I'm a nasty guy. I'm a raving lunatic. I'm raving on and on. And I love it. No one can stop me. I paint imaginary thoughts of horror and blood. I'm going to download and watch the original "Black Christmas" and watch it over and over. I rented the Dark Knight, but it won't play on my PlayStation 2. Can't play it on my DVD. 'Cause I broke that fucking thing, too. Long time ago. Who really reads this shit anyway? Maybe I should compile all my posts into one massive book and sell it? That seems to be the trend nowadays "My Life As A Whore" seems to the gist of it for some of these "bestsellers." Shee-it.

I hope Santa gets murdered in the North Pole. But that won't happen, because Santa isn't real. I'm not real, either. There's really no Patrick Doran. Only the person who is typing this. But it's not Patrick Doran. Patrick is dead. There's only Zool..

Don't Trust The Cops

2008-11-30T21:19:00.000-08:00

This was a comment left by a reader of a previous post about cops illegally stripsearching a woman completely naked.

Stinger503 said...
Agreed. Sorry police but when the Sheriff says that it was "by the book" when its on video and clearly against the stated policy, then YOUR FULL OF SHIT! In my opinion, all of the officers that were present should be fired as well as the entire chain of command. I'm sorry but when your lying like that you're corrupt.

He also had THIS to share:

This is probably even worse! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qVXPEGHdDlg

I don't like police, I don't trust police, and I won't depend on the police. I've had too many bad experiences with cops. They are not our protectors, it's just another job to them, and one they complain about and slack off on.

I was once beaten up pretty badly during a swarming attack. I was a bloody mess. Some people took me into their home and called the police and an ambulance. When the cops came they're trying to question, when I should've been looked at by a doctor first. They even tried to convince me not to take an ambulance. I was a bloody mess, and these guys were keeping me inside a complete stranger's house, sizing me up as if I was the threat. Fuck the police.

Thinking about it now, I wonder how I could've handled that situation better. What do you do when you're all beat up, and the cops are keeping you inside someone else's house, trying to question you before you've even been looked at by a doctor.

Anyone else got similar experiences?

From AKKUS

I was attacked on a sidewalk by a couple of illegal aliens who injured me and pushed me into traffic. Over the next two hours, I talked to five cops. None of them would look into the situation. The first said he couldn't do anything as he hadn't seen it occur. The second threatened to arrest me for "making a false report", though he had made no effort to look into my claim. The third, a relative of mine, just laughed when I told him that I had been threatened with arrest for reporting the crime. I was told that I could file a complaint against the cop who threatened me, but that's like having a producer rate his own movie.

This is just one of many horrible experiences I and people close to me have had with cops. I have zero confidence in them and their commitment to "Protect and Serve", as is so hypocritically painted on their cruisers.

To "Protect and Serve" is right .

I remember once, when I was eleven years old, there was a fight going on in one of the apartment complexes in my neighborhood. Apparently police were called, but it seemed like no one was coming, so I found a cop sitting inside a coffee bar just right nearby. I tried convincing him to take care of this, but his attitude was "I'm on my break." I had to go back into the coffee bar four or five times before he finally decided to get off his fat ass.

He ended up arresting and using pepper spray on an intoxicated man that was fleeing from the apartment complex. I remember how mad I felt inside, after his backup arrived, they pat this schmuck on the shoulders and tell him "good work."

Analysis of Police Corruption

Police corruption is a complex phenomenon, which does not
readily submit to simple analysis. It is a problem that has and will
continue to affect us all, whether we are civilians or law enforcement
officers. Since its beginnings, may aspects of policing have changed;
however, one aspect that has remained relatively unchanged is the
existence of corruption. An examination of a local newspaper or any
police-related publication on any given day will have an article about
a police officer that got busted committing some kind of corrupt act.
Police corruption has increased dramatically with the illegal cocaine
trade, with officers acting alone or in-groups to steal money from
dealers or distribute cocaine themselves. Large groups of corrupt
police have been caught in New York, New Orleans, Washington, DC, and
Los Angeles.

Methodology: Corruption within police departments falls into 2
basic categories, which are external corruption and internal
corruption. In this report I will concentrate only on external
corruption because it has been the larger center of attention
recently. I have decided to include the fairly recent accounts of
corruption from a few major cities, mainly New York, because that is
where I have lived for the past 22 years. I compiled my information
from numerous articles written in the New York Times over the last 5
years. My definitional infornmation and background data came from
various books cited that have been written on the issue of police
corruption. Those books helped me create a basis of just what the
different types of corruption and deviances are, as well as how and
why corruption happens. The books were filled with useful insite but
were not update enough, so I relied on the newspaper articles to
provide me with the current, and regional information that was needed
to complete this report. In simple terms, corruption in policing is
usually viewed as the misuse of authority by a police officer acting
offically to fulfill personal needs or wants. For a corrupt act to
occure, three distinct elements of police corruption must be present
simultaneously: 1) missuse of authority, 2) missuse of official
capacity, and 3) missuse of personal attainment. (Dantzker, 1995: p
157) It can be said that power inevitably tends to corrupt, and it is
yet to be recongnized that, while there is no reason to suppose that
policemen as individuals are any less fallible than other members of
society, people are often shocked and outraged when policemen are
exposed violating the law. The reason is simple. There diviance
elicits a special feeling of betrayal. "Most studies support the view
that corruption is endemic, if not universal, in police departments.
The danger of corruption for police, and this is that it may invert
the formal goals of the organization and may lead to "the use of
organizational power to encourage and create crime rather than to
deter it" (Sherman 1978: p 31) General police deviance can include
brutality, discrimination, sexual harassment, intimidation, and
illicit use of weapons. However it is not particularly obvious where
brutality, discrimination, and misconduct end and corruption begin.
Essentially, police corruption falls into two major categories--
external corruption which concerns police contacts with the public,
and internal corruption, which involves the relationships among
policemen within the works of the police department. The external
corruption generally concists of one ore more of the following
activities: 1) Payoffs to police by essentially non-criminal elements
who fail to comply with stringent statutes or city ordinances; (for
example, inviduals who repeatedly violate traffic laws). 2) Payoffs to
police by individuals who continually violate the law as a method of
making money (for example, prostitutes, narcotics addicts and
pusshers, & professional burglars). 3) "Clean Graft" where money is
paid to police for services, or where courtesy discounts are given as
a matter of course to the police. "Police officers have been involved
in activities such as extortion of money and/or narcotics from
narcotics viloators in order to aviod arrest; they have accepted
bribes; they have sold narcotics. They have known of narcotics
vilolations and have failed to take proper enforcement action. They
have entered into personal associations with narcotics criminals and
in some cases have used narcotics. They have given false testimony in
court in order to obtain dismissal of the charges against a
defendant." (Sherman 1978: p 129) A scandal is perceived both as a
socially constructed phenomenon and as an agent of change that can
lead to realignments in the structure of power within oraganizations.
New york, for instance, has had more than a half dozen major scandals
concerning its police department within a century. It was the Knapp
Commission in 1972 that first brought attention to the NYPD when they
released the results of over 2 years of investigations of alleged
corruption. The findings were that bribery, especially amoung
narcotics officers, was extremely high. As a result many officers were
prosecuted and many more lost their jobs. A massive re-structuring
took place aftewards with strict rules and regulations to make sure
that the problem would never happen again. Be that as it may, the
problem did arrise once gain... Some of the most recent events to
shake New York City and bring attention to the national problem of
police corruption was brought up begining in 1992 when five officers
were arrested on drug-trafficing charges.

Michael Dowd, the suspected 'ring leader', was the kind of cop
who gave new meaning to the word moonlighting. It wasn't just any job
that the 10-year veteran of the New York City force was working on the
side. Dowd was a drug dealer. From scoring free pizza as a rookie he
graduated to pocketing cash seized in drug raids and from there simply
to robbing dealers outright, sometimes also relieving them of drugs
that he would resell. Soon he had formed ``a crew'' of 15 to 20
officers in his Brooklyn precinct who hit up dealers regularly.
Eventually one of them was paying Dowd and another officer $8,000 a
week in protection money. Dowd bought four suburban homes and a
$35,000 red Corvette. Nobody asked how he managed all that on
take-home pay of $400 a week. In May 1992 Dowd, four other officers
and one former officer were arrested for drug trafficking by police in
Long Island's Suffolk County. When the arrests hit the papers, it was
forehead-slapping time among police brass. Not only had some of their
cops become robbers, but the crimes had to be uncovered by a suburban
police force. Politicians and the media started asking what had
happened to the system for rooting out police corruption established
21 years ago at the urging of the Knapp Commission, the investigatory
body that heard Officer Frank Serpico and other police describe a
citywide network of rogue cops. (New York Times, March 29, 1993: p 8)
To find out, at the time, New York City mayor David Dinkins
established the Mollen Commission, named for its chairman, Milton
Mollen, a former New York judge. Last week, in the same Manhattan
hearing room where the Knapp Commission once sat, the new body heard
Dowd and other officers add another lurid chapter to the old story of
police corruption. And with many American cities wary that drug money
will turn their departments bad, police brass around the country were
lending an uneasy ear to the tales of officers sharing lines of coke
from the dashboard of their squad cars and scuttling down fire escapes
with sacks full of cash stolen from dealers' apartments. (New York
Times, April 3, 1993: p. 5) The Mollen Commission has not uncovered a
citywide system of payoffs among the 30,000-member force. In fact,
last week's testimony focused on three precincts, all in heavy crime
areas. But the tales, nevertheless, were troubling. Dowd described how
virtually the entire precinct patrol force would rendezvous at times
at an inlet on Jamaica Bay, where they would drink, shoot off guns in
the air and plan their illegal drug raids. (New York Times, Nov. 17,
1993: p. 3) It was "victimless crimes" problem which many view was a
prime cause in the growth of police abuse. Reports have shown that the
large majority of corrupt acts by police involve payoffs from both the
perpetrators and the "victims" of victimless crimes. The knapp
commission in the New York found that although corruption among police
officers was not restricted to this area, the bulk of it involved
payments of money to the police from gamblers and prostitutes. (Knapp
Commission Report, 1973: pp 1-3) ``The cops who were engaged in
corruption 20 years ago took money to cover up the criminal activity
of others,'' says Michael Armstrong, who was chief counsel to the
Knapp Commission. `` Now it seems cops have gone into competition with
street criminals.'' (Newsweek, Oct 21,1992: p. 18) For cops as for
anyone else, money works age for crooked police. Gambling syndicates
in the 1950s were protected by a payoff system more elaborate than the
Internal Revenue Service. Pervasive corruption may have lessened in
recent years, as many experts believe, but individual examples seem to
have grown more outrageous. In March authorities in Atlanta broke up a
ring of weight-lifting officers who were charged with robbing strip
clubs and private homes, and even carrying off 450-lb. safes from
retail stores. (Washington Post, Jan 18, 1993: p. 11) The deluge of
cash that has flowed from the drug trade has created opportunities for
quick dirty money on a scale never seen before. In the 1980s
Philadelphia saw more than 30 officers convicted of taking part in a
scheme to extort money from dealers. In Los Angeles an FBI probe
focusing on the L.A. County sheriff's department has resulted so far
in 36 indictments and 19 convictions on charges related to enormous
thefts of cash during drug raids -- more than $1 million in one
instance. ``The deputies were pursuing the money more aggressively
than they were pursuing drugs,'' says Assistant U.S. Attorney Steven
Bauer. (Washington Post, Jan 18, 1993: p. 11) When cities enlarge
their police forces quickly in response to public fears about crime,
it can also mean an influx of younger and less well-suited officers.
That was a major reason for the enormous corruption scandal that hit
Miami in the mid-1980s, when about 10% of the city's police were
either jailed, fired or disciplined in connection with a scheme in
which officers robbed and sometimes killed cocaine smugglers on the
Miami River, then resold the drugs. Many of those involved had been
hired when the department had beefed up quickly after the 1980 riots
and the Mariel boatlift. ``We didn't get the quality of officers we
should have,'' says department spokesman Dave Magnusson. (Carter,
1989: pp. 78-79) When it came time to clean house, says former Miami
police chief Perry Anderson, civil service board members often chose
to protect corrupt cops if there was no hard evidence to convict them
in the courts. ``I tried to fire 25 people with tarnished badges, but
it was next to impossible,'' he recalls. (Carter, 1989: pp. 78-79)

The Mollen Commission testimony could also lead to second
thoughts on the growth of community policing, the back-to-the-beat
philosophy that in recent years has been returning officers to
neighborhood patrol in cities around the country, including New York.
Getting to know the neighborhood can mean finding more occasions for
bribe taking, which is one reason that in many places beat patrolling
was scaled back since the 1960s in favor of more isolated squad-car
teams. The real test of a department is not so much whether its
officers are tempted by money but whether there is an institutional
culture that discourages them from succumbing. In Los Angeles the
sheriff's department ``brought us the case,'' says FBI special agent
Charlie Parsons. ``They worked with us hand in glove throughout the
investigation.'' (Washington Post, Jan 18, 1993: p. 11) In the years
after it was established, following the Knapp Commission disclosures,
the New York City police department's internal affairs division was
considered one of the nation's most effective in stalking corruption.
But that may not be the case anymore. Police sergeant Joseph Trimboli,
a department investigator, told the Mollen Commission that when he
tried to root out Dowd and other corrupt cops, his efforts were
blocked by higher-ups in the department. At one point, Trimboli
claimed, he was called to a meeting of police officials and told he
was under suspicion as a drug trafficker. ``They did not want this
investigation to exist,'' he said. (New York Times, April 3, 1993: p.
5) It was at this time that New York City police commissioner, at the
time, Raymond Kelly announced a series of organizational changes,
including a larger staff and better-coordinated field investigations,
intended to improve internal affairs. His critics say those changes
don't go far enough. Much of that happened after Kelly's reforms had
been announced. The Mollen Commission is recommend the establishment
of an outside monitoring agency, a move that Kelly and other police
brass have expressed some reservations about. ``No group is good at
policing itself,'' says Knapp Commission counsel Armstrong. ``It
doesn't hurt to have somebody looking over their shoulder.'' An
independent body, however, might be less effective at getting
co-operation from cops prone to close ranks against outsiders. ``You
have to have the confidence of officers and information about what's
going on internally,'' says former U.S. Attorney Thomas Puccio, who
prosecuted a number of police-corruption cases. (New York Times, April
3, 1993: p. 5) Getting that information was no easier when officers
were encouraged to report wrongdoing to authorities within their own
department. In many cities that have them, internal affairs divisions
are resented within the ranks for getting cops to turn in other cops
-- informers are even recruited from police-academy cadets -- and for
rarely targeting the brass. ``One of the things that has come out in
the hearings is a culture within the department which seems to permit
corruption to exist,'' says Walter Mack, a one time federal prosecutor
who is now New York's deputy commissioner of internal affairs. ``But
when you're talking about cultural change, you're talking about many
years. It's not something that occurs overnight.'' (New York Post,
June 14, 1993: p. 28) Dowd, who was sentenced prison on guilty please,
put it another way. ``Cops don't want to turn in other cops,'' he
said. ``Cops don't want to be a rat.'' And even when honest cops are
willing to blow the whistle, there may not be anyone willing to
listen. (New York Times, Mar. 29, 1993: p. 14) Is there a solution to
the police corruption problem? Probably not because since its
beginings, many aspects of policing have changed, but one thing that
has not is the existence of corruption. Police agenies, in an attempt
to elminate corruption have tried everything from increasing salaries,
requiring more training and education, and developing polices which
are intended to focus directly on factors leading to corruption. What
have all these changes done to eliminate or even decrease the
corruption problem? Little or nothing. Despite police departments'
attempts to control corruption, it still occurs. Regardless of the
fact, police corruption cannot simply be over looked. Controling
corruption is the only way that we can really limit corruption,
because corruption is the by-product of the individual police officer,
societal views, and, police environmental factors. Therefore control
must come from not only the police department, but also must require
the assistance and support of the community members. Controling
corruption from the departmental level requires a strong leadership
organization, because corruption can take place any where from the
patrol officer to the chief. The top administrator must make it clear
from the start that he and the other members of the department are
against any form of corrupt activity, and that it will not be
tollerated in any way, shape, or form. If a police administrator does
not act strongly with disciplinary action against any corrupt
activity, the message conveyed to other officers within the department
will not be that of intimated nature. In addition it may even increase
corruption, because officers feel no actions will be taken against
them. Another way that police agencies can control its corruption
problem starts orginally in the academy. Ethical decisions and
behavior should be promoted, because failing to do make officers aware
of the consequences of corruption does nothing but encourages it.
Finally, many police departments, especially large ones, have an
Internal Affairs unit which operates to investigate improper conduct
of police departments. These units some times are run within the
department or can be a total outside agency to insure that there is
not corruption from within the Internal Affairs unit, as was alleged
in the 1992 NYPD corruption scandal. Such a unit may be all that is
need to prevent many officers from being tempted into falling for
corrupt behavior patterns. Although the police agaency should be the
main source of controling its own corruption problem, there also
requires some support and assistance from the local community. It is
important that the public be educated to the negative affects of
corruption on their police agency. They should be taught that even
'graitudes' (the most basic and common form of police corruption) is
only a catalyst for more and future corruption. The community may even
go as far as establishing review boards, and investigative bodies to
help keep a careful eye on the agency. If we do not act to try and
control it, the costs can be enormous, because it affects not only the
individual, his department, the law enforcement community as a whole,
but society as well. Police corruption can be controlled; it just
takes a little extra effort. And In the long run, that effort will be
well worth it to both the agency and the community. (Walker, 1992: p.
89)

The powers given by the state to the police to use force have
always caused concern. Although improvements have been made to control
corruption, numerous opportunities exist for deviant and corrupt
practices. The opportunity to aquire power in excess of that which is
legally permitted or to misuse power is always available. The police
subculture is a contributing factor to these practices, because
officers who often act in a corrupt manner are often over looked, and
condoned by other members of the subculture. As mentioned from the
very begining of this report the problem of police deviance and
corruption will never be completely solved, just as the police will
never be able to solve the crime problem in our society. One step in
the right direction, however, is the monitoring and control of the
police and the appropriate use of police style to enforce laws and to
provide service to the public.

---
Works Cited

Beals, Gregory (1993, Oct 21). Why Good Cops Go Bad. Newsweek, p. 18.

Carter, David L. (1986). Deviance & Police. Ohio: Anderson Publishing
Co.

Castaneda, Ruben (1993, Jan. 18). Bearing the Badge of Mistrust. The
Washington Post, p. 11.

Dantzker, Mark L. (1995, ). Understanding Today's Police. New Jersey:
Prentice-Hall, Inc.

James, George (1993, Mar. 29). Confessions of Corruption. The New York
Times, p. 8.

James, George (1993, Nov. 17). Officials Say Police Corruption is Hard
To Stop. The New York Times, p. 3.

Sherman, Lawrence W (1978). Scandal And Reform. Los Angeles:
University of California Press.

Simpson, Scott T. (1993, June 14). Mollen Commission Findings. New
York Post, p. 28

Walker, J.T. (1992). Briefs of 100 leading cases in the law
enforcement. Cincinnati: Anderson Publishing Company.

Weber, Bruce (1993, April 3). Confessions of Corruption. The New York
Times, p. 5.

Man Trampeled To Death At Wal-Mart

2008-11-30T21:15:00.000-08:00

Worker dies at Long Island Wal-Mart after being trampled in Black Friday stampede

BY JOE GOULD, CLARE TRAPASSO AND RICH SCHAPIRO
DAILY NEWS WRITERS

Updated Friday, November 28th 2008, 10:46 PM

A Wal-Mart worker died early Friday after an "out-of-control" mob of frenzied shoppers smashed through the Long Island store's front doors and trampled him, police said.

The Black Friday stampede plunged the Valley Stream outlet into chaos, knocking several employees to the ground and sending others scurrying atop vending machines to avoid the horde.

When the madness ended, 34-year-old Jdimytai Damour was dead and four shoppers, including a woman eight months pregnant, were injured.

CAUGHT ON CAMERA: WAL-MART CROWD MOMENTS BEFORE DEADLY STAMPEDE

"He was bum-rushed by 200 people," said Wal-Mart worker Jimmy Overby, 43.

"They took the doors off the hinges. He was trampled and killed in front of me.

"They took me down, too ... I didn't know if I was going to live through it. I literally had to fight people off my back," Overby said.

Damour, a temporary maintenance worker from Jamaica, Queens, was gasping for air as shoppers continued to surge into the store after its 5 a.m. opening, witnesses said.

Even officers who arrived to perform CPR on the trampled worker were stepped on by wild-eyed shoppers streaming inside, a cop at the scene said.

"They pushed him down and walked all over him," Damour's sobbing sister, Danielle, 41, said. "How could these people do that?

"He was such a young man with a good heart, full of life. He didn't deserve that."

Damour's sister said doctors told the family he died of a heart attack.

His cousin, Ernst Damour, called the circumstances "completely unacceptable."

"His body was a stepping bag with so much disregard for human life," Ernst Damour, 37, said. "There has to be some accountability."

Roughly 2,000 people gathered outside the Wal-Mart's doors in the predawn darkness.

Chanting "push the doors in," the crowd pressed against the glass as the clock ticked down to the 5 a.m. opening.

Sensing catastrophe, nervous employees formed a human chain inside the entrance to slow down the mass of shoppers.

It didn't work.

The mob barreled in and overwhelmed workers.

"They were jumping over the barricades and breaking down the door," said Pat Alexander, 53, of Crown Heights, Brooklyn. "Everyone was screaming. You just had to keep walking on your toes to keep from falling over."

After the throng toppled Damour, his fellow employees had to fight through the crowd to help him, police said.

Witness Kimberly Cribbs said shoppers acted like "savages."

"When they were saying they had to leave, that an employee got killed, people were yelling, 'I've been on line since Friday morning!'" Cribbs said. "They kept shopping."

When paramedics arrived, Damour's condition was grave.

"They were pumping his chest, trying to bring him back, and there was nothing," said Dennis Smokes, 36, a Wal-Mart worker.

Damour was taken to Franklin Hospital and pronounced dead at 6:03 a.m.

Hank Mullany, president of Wal-Mart's northeast division, said the company took extraordinary safety precautions.

"We expected a large crowd this morning and added additional internal security, additional third-party security, additional store associates and we worked closely with the Nassau County police," he said in a statement.

"We also erected barricades. Despite all of our precautions, this unfortunate event occurred."

The 28-year-old pregnant woman and three other shoppers were taken to area hospitals with minor injuries, police said.

In a news conference after the incident, Nassau County police spokesman Lt. Michael Fleming described the crowd as "out of control" and the scene as "utter chaos." He said Wal-Mart did not have enough security onhand.

Fleming said criminal charges were possible but that it would be difficult to identify individual shoppers in surveillance videos.

Items on sale at the Wal-Mart store included a $798 Samsung 50-inch Plasma HDTV, a Bissel Compact Upright Vacuum for $28 and Men's Wrangler Tough Jeans for $8.

The Long Island store reopened at 1 p.m. and was packed within minutes.

"I look at these people's faces and I keep thinking one of them could have stepped on him," said one employee. "How could you take a man's life to save $20 on a TV?"

rschapiro@nydailynews.com

With Brendan Brosh and James Queally

People are stupid, they truly are. It's kind of hard to have faith in humanity when the majority are made up of people like the ones stampeding into a Wal-Mart trampelling people to death. The greed!

I remember dropping off product to a Salvation Army store in Richmond, BC. All these Asian people were gathered outside the store, propped up against the glass looking like Garfield cats from the inside of the store. Apparently the store was having some kind of sale. My co-worker and I had to go through the front door to wheel in appliances on our dollies. Once the doors opened, all these Chinese people were trying to force their way in. I grabbed a Chinese man by the back of his jacket and yanked him out of my way, as he tried to get into the store (it wasn't even open yet). My partner and I had to fight our way past the mob. At the time, it was among the funniest shit I've ever experienced.

People are so stupid and greedy.

Horrifying Video of Cops Performing Illegal Stripsearch on a Woman

2008-11-29T20:18:00.000-08:00

I hate police. For every good cop there's probably 12 bad ones. The police are scum. MadShangi says "Fuck the police."

Tales from the Crypt presents: Bordello of Blood - An Allegory for the Bloodsucking Nature of Feminists

2008-11-27T15:54:00.000-08:00

Since, I read Julian Real's deconstruction of the teen vampire flick "Twilight." I decided it was time for a humorous retro review for an older vampire flick, the much forgotten "Tales from the Crypt: Bordello of Blood" starring Dennis Miller!

Bordello of Blood (also known as Tales from the Crypt Presents: Bordello of Blood) is a 1996 comedy/horror film starring Dennis Miller, Erika Eleniak, Angie Everhart, Corey Feldman, and Chris Sarandon. It is based on the television series Tales from the Crypt. Dennis Miller plays a private investigator who ends up in a bordello run by vampires, led by the Mother of all Vampires, Lilith (Everhart).

A man called Vincent and his associates are exploring a forest, until they find a cave containing a coffin with the skeleton of Lilith, the mother of all vampires. Vincent takes a box out of his pocket, which contains the four sections of Lilith's heart. He puts it in her body, and she rapidly begins reanimating. After coming back to life, she rips the hearts out of the associates and goes after Vincent, who produces the key artifact seen in Demon Knight. Lilith promises to Vincent that if she can have the last man in the room to eat, she will behave for him.

The Crypt Keeper is having lunch with the Mummy (William Sadler), who is boring the Crypt Keeper about his life in the film industry. The Mummy challenges the Crypt Keeper to a contest of rock, paper, scissors which the Mummy wins, and he slices off the Keeper's hand with a meat cleaver. The Crypt Keeper laughs (as it didn't hurt him at all) and the Mummy gets ready for the next round. The Crypt Keeper addresses the audience, and the movie continues.

Katherine (Erika Eleniak) lives with her delinquent brother Caleb (Corey Feldman). When he turns up missing, Katherine goes to the police to ask them to look for him, to no avail. Katherine reluctantly hires Rafe Guttman (Dennis Miller), a cynical and sarcastic private investigator whose office is an old adult movie theater, to look for Caleb. Rafe uncovers a brothel in a funeral home being run by vampires, where the money from the clients that visit the brothel is put towards a major Christian organization. The dwarf, meanwhile, destroys the key, so Lilith is now immortal.

Katherine gets kidnapped when they fall for a trap set up by the now-vampiric Caleb. Rafe kills the dwarf and fills some super soakers with holy water, and he and the reverend (looking to redeem himself) enter the brothel, burning all the vampires. They find Lilith, and soon the reverend is killed by a knife in the heart, and Lilith also breaks his hand. Meanwhile, Rafe finds Caleb and uses the super soaker on him. Caleb's body is burned, and he falls to the ground.

Rafe rescues Katherine. Back at the church, while shooting a documentary, Lilith returns, leaving a bloody trail. Rafe cuts her heart back into four parts, as that is the only thing that can destroy her, once the parts are out of her body. Rafe is about to be killed by Lilith when Katherine grabs a trident and stabs Lilith's heart out. Lilith's body burns to bone, and Katherine and Rafe leave.

After locking away the box with the hearts in it, Rafe and Katherine sit in Rafe's car. Rafe begins to fondle Katherine, when he asks "What's that perfume you're wearing?". He pulls back her skirt to find a pair of bite-marks on her thigh, where she was presumably bitten by Lilith. Katherine replies, "It's not perfume. It's sunblock". Then she quickly reveals her fangs as she bites into Rafe's neck. The camera cranes upwards as we hear Rafe screaming.

Another Crypt Keeper clip is shown, then the credits roll.

The vampire prostitutes make the perfect representation of feminism. These women are in charge of their own exploitation, which makes them "empowered," feeding off men for sustenance. It is really the male clients that are exploited, while these empowered women rip off heads, rip out hearts, and bite into them hungrily like the Elizabeth Bathorys that they are. This is very similar to the way modern marriage works, as men get married to these women and slowly become drained of their fortunes, their livelihoods, their children, and their property. Sucked dry by the evil vampire women.

"Bordello of Blood" is required viewing for those interested in discovering the true nature of feminism. ;)

"Twilight" An Allegory For The Bloodsucking Nature of White Hetero Males

2008-11-26T20:29:00.001-08:00

Just when I thought I was done talking about the fruit cake known as Julian Real, a stumble across this latest blog entry. In it he takes a crack at being an amateur film critic, and watches the vampire flick "Twilight" through his radical profeminist lens. And the results are expected and hilariously stupid.

"Twilight": another tale of the awful plight of the troubled white serial killer

Where the vampire's otherness posed a terrifying threat for the original readers of Dracula, [...] today that same alien quality is often perceived as an attraction. As rebellious outsider, as persecuted minority, as endangered species, and as member of a different "race" that legend portrays as sexually omnicompetent, the vampire makes a fitting hero for late twentieth-century popular fiction. --"The Vampire as Alien in Contemporary Fiction", by Margaret L. Carter, p. 29 of Blood Read.

The white, dark-haired, not-so-badboy is back. His name is Edward Cullen and he's "sexier", and paler, than ever. Edward is keeping his damsel-in-distress, Bella Swan, out of trouble with the enemies of true white love--you know, those with the "longest incisors". Keep in mind the story of The Ugly Duckling--with feathers all stubby and brown--the first three and a half minutes of this YouTube video tells the tale. Only when it becomes a white swan does it become bella, or beautiful. So of course he's desired by and desires a young thin pale white woman--duh! ("Out" gay men and butch lesbians of any color are not likely to make the cut as "the romantic love interest" anytime soon in a major motion picture.) And of course he desires to BE WITH HER ALWAYS (creepy!), never letting him out of his sight, or, well, to be her soulmate. (Too often in real life: same diff.) This is where this story lures us in: is he a bad "irresistable" pale guy who wants to be good, or a good guy whose passions will lead him to be bad? Even without long incisors, we are aware he carries danger somewhere inside himself... perhaps in his molars.

It sometimes gets confusing as to who exactly is evil in racist Western patriarchal cultural mythology. But generally speaking, in cinema, all that is white, including good-whiteguy cowboy hats, represents good. All that is dark or black, including bad whiteguy cowboy hats, as well as anyone with unpale or "black" skin and allegedly "black" eye color, is ominous, dangerous, and just plain evil. The 1960s campy TV vampire soap opera was called "Dark Shadows" not "Sunny Days" for a reason. More on Twilight's racism a bit later.

This story draws on themes that go all the way back to the Old Testament (with that original irresistible white temptress who only makes the weak white man feel badly about himself for giving into temptation). Is this another telling of male supremacy's Adam and Eve'l or Romeo and Juliet? Well, the woman in such myths is a threat to a man's well-being or she's dead; or, in vampire films, perhaps a combination of both.

This is the dilemma our newest pale male vampire faces in Twilight: to love Bella, be with her, as an abnormal human doing his best to assimilate, or to steel himself away from her, for her own good. Edward isn't your common cannibal, after all. He only goes after non-human animals for snacks, unlike the other more overtly predatory heteromale vampires in this film, such as James--a common cannibal who really hates vampires who won't suck the life out of people who are (only) human. (Figuring out what to serve such a lot at a U.S. holiday supper must get so problematic. I don't get the sense anyone would be all that happy with tofurkey.)

In Edward and James we have the eternal inner struggle of the perrenially tormented pale vampire: To bite/penetrate/kill or not to bite/penetrate/kill? For Edward, a diet of pets may suffice. But not so for James, whose specific tastes might be termed Bellatarian. Good vampire vs. bad vampire. Each battling for the love, or blood, of Bella. The subtitle to this film could just as well be "It's Hard Out Here for a Vampire". Poor fellas. Poor Bella--drawn to a man who cannot love her without the risk of her being destroyed. Here is the painful passion found in many abusive relationships: she wants him, but he's not good for her; he wants her, but his love might result in her death. But back to fiction.

Vampire movies are, historically, a Hollywood film genre known for eroticising pale male violence against [traditionally] young thin white women, in that "oh-so-sexy-while-creepy" way. Sure, there was that 1994 ECD oh-so-controversial Brad Pitt-Tom Cruise homoeroticism pervading some scenes in Anne Rice's best-seller brought to the screen, Interview with the Vampire". (And, the blogger noted sarcastically, they really pushed the envelope regarding who is seen as handsome in Hollywood with that film, eh?)

We might note the number of women involved in the maintenance of this genre. I suspect because these stories are, on the surface, more romance and passion than ugly predation and woman-killing. (Male writers and directors still hold the market on the bloodier, "terrify, fuck, and kill the woman" films. But given the racist-sexist pornographication of Western society, it matters not if the story is written by a woman or a man. All these lines between love, romance, danger, and death have been blurring for some time. Terror and horror can be themes in a dominant society that won't own the real horrific and terrible things that it does, like, say, keeping a genocide going on this soil.

In fact, the blending of racism (not just symbolically), heterosexism, the potential and impending death of a woman or women, spiced with turn-on or terror, is something that U.S. films and many top rated TV shows just can't exist without. For Hollywood, leaving the violence out of sexist and racist themes, and the sexism and racism out of violence, would, well, be like depriving a predatory heteromale vampire of fresh female blood. Well, the female blood that comes from the neck area*.

[*There are plenty of tired, misogynist jokes about male vampires being drawn to women who are having their periods. The idea with this humor is that it is "gross" (hence funny) because, you must understand, menstruating women are really gross, so men say. Menstruation = gross = funny. Yes, this does mean dominant male society's emotional maturity level is perpetually in elementary school. Perhaps because of being raised in the company of plenty of girls and women, I've never understood the aversion to menstrual blood. Women friends and I have discussed using it in political work. For me, the more it is in men's faces the better. Why is it "in vogue" to cover women's faces in men's semen? Because it shows who is degrading whom, and that semen is gross, not hot, when it touches female flesh. (In gay male pornography, it's only hot, because it never touches female flesh.)

I can't seem to get through to my gay and heterosexual brothers on this topic. They'll shriek and cringe like, well, the misogynistic mensesphobic grown men they are, when I bring up the subject of menstrual blood. They share stories of personal "horror" such as when a young or older man finds external evidence lying around of a woman having her period, such as when a woman doesn't waste water by not flushing the toilet when there's drops of blood in it as well as urine, or when the disposal of a tampon or pad is shamelessly left atop a bathroom wastebin "insufficiently" cocooned in toilet paper. The key to understanding misogynist men's attitudes about women and blood is this: blood from the uterus--not sexy. Blood from any other area of a woman--sexy. Menstrual blood is not the kind of blood men eroticise in (or on) women because it is a sign of pre-menopausal women's health, and life. Women bleeding is, in the misogynistic imagination, supposed to be fused only to the possibility of female death. Of course this still allows men the pornographic option of being the violent cause of women's internal bleeding, anywhere in her body, including down there.]

But where were we? Ah yes: misogyny and racism.

Pale white is the dominant U.S./U.K. new (oh, and not-so-new, and olden days) "beautiful", according to fables, Hollywood, Madison Avenue, and corporate pimps. Surely you remember: "Mirror, mirror on the wall, who's the fairest one of all?" and all that other racist-hetero/sexist children's story horseshit. But the claims of the vampire as another race gets tricky in a film like this one. For there are, [SPOILER ALERT!!] actual people of color depicted in this movie. In typical Hollywood racist fashion, American Indians have "a role" to play in this film, and, unfortunately, it's not solely to remind the pale-faced leeches to go back to Transylvania... or wherever in Europe we came from. Here, they can be werewolves. (Wait: isn't that basically how Hollywood has ALWAYS presented American Indians?) As such, they become "animals" for white-night-crawling vampires to drain. (Sarcasm alert:) Humans as animals: nothing sexist or racist about that!

As for the hidden and not-so-hidden misogynist violence within this genre, one need only note that in the 2008 ECD vampire TV show True Blood, there was reference to a "fang-banging". (The dots are all connected, it's just that we're trained to see only dots, no lines.) Curiously, this time it's the TV show that could "go there" while this movie, rated [SPOILER ALERT!!] PG-13, doesn't quite. Ah, the allure of the long period of longing in heterosexual seduction. The endless wait for consummation, a word which means to bring to fruition, to fuck if newly married, and to terminate. (How quaint of the English language to offer up such a term.)

Twilight, according to reports, handles this topic of consummation in an way that shouldn't upset too many folks who are into the whole white Christian conservative spawned (and miserably failing) phenomena of the "virginity pledge" and the "Purity Ring".

There will be no "sex" (meaning, OF COURSE, genital-to-genital male-with-female intercourse) in this new film! Sparing the audience of predominantly white, middle class adolescent girls and their moms of scenes of consummation means you have a Disney-tame plot line with enough sexual tension to take us through several sequels, or centuries: whichever comes first. It also means that grown men are not so likely to go see this one. (We're virtually all addicted to Internet porn anyway, so "Bye, ladies, have fun at the movies!" This is not to say one need leave home to see fangy-toothed men portrayed graphically.

For example, you may have seen this vampiric theme on CSI:

">

In overtly sexually violent
Vogue magazine photos, and in this more "tame" Vogue image in which such thin white young women seem to walk the line, visually, between life and death.

And in the news, men serially murdering women is also nothing new. To modify a famous quote by C. A. MacKinnon: Man kills women; subject verb objects. There has even been a real life vampire serial killer.

Academics, too, have tackled this theme. For an especially good analytic piece on the subject, see this.

I can only wonder about the on-going jokes of the dashing draculesque dude having blue-balls, and not just because he's so damned cold all the time. All I can say is: Edward Cullen, take matters into your own hands. If you don't get to that nubile female human blood in time, what's the worst thing that can happen? Oh, right: you die, for good.

To Edward, James, and any readers of this blog who happen to be vampires, I recommend that you leave white women, men and women of color, and non-human animals alone and go crawl into a coffin.

Male pale-faces, go home to Transylvania!

Hey, Edward--what do you think of that idea?

I thought so.

Get ready for the sequels, folks.

For a whole book on this subject, see Blood Read: The Vampire as Metaphor in Contemporary Society, edited by Joan Gordon and Veronica Hollinger.

If interested in more plot details, see here.

For discussion and analysis of the racism in the book (which spills over into the film), click here.

For a wonderfully transgressive fictional spin on the same ole plot, see Jewelle Gomez's The Gilda Stories. A review of her book is here.

(Revised on Nov. 25)

I posted a comment on this blog, I don't expect any sort of response, nor do I expect it to be shown. Julian has control over what comments can or cannot be shown on his page. The ones he keeps, though, are usually copied and pasted and used in his rants.

I feel disgusted right now. Not because Julian Real is a fucking idiot (and he is). But because after all that, he turned out to be a pretty weak opponent. Here is a guy who would go out of his way to smear those whose ideologies conflicted with his, only to be a quitter. Now has half-baked movie reviews, in the guise of social commentary? Bullshit!

The comment I submitted went something like this.

"Twilight," an allegory of the bloodsucking nature of White Hetero Men? You truly are a fucking idiot. Does ANYONE besides you take you seriously?

Batman To Be Killed off... by Robin?!

2008-11-25T16:50:00.000-08:00

Oh he'll be back, motherfuckers. They brought back Superman, you know. It seems a fitting time to kill off the bats after the success of the new reboot movies. And you know what that means? Time for another reboot to the DC Universe.

And I say, it's about damn time. And in this Universe let's hope we get no fucking Robin. Kill him Bats, before he kills you! Little Boy Wonder Cocksucker!

Batman to be killed off after 70 years

Batman is to be killed off after 70 years, the comic's writer has revealed.

By Urmee Khan
Last Updated: 1:12PM GMT 25 Nov 2008

Does Robin kill Batman? Photo: WARNER BROS 'Batman RIP' will see "the end of Bruce Wayne as Batman", according to Grant Morrison.

There are rumours that Batman will suffer a gruesome end when his sidekick Robin goes over to "the dark side" and destroys him in a terrible betrayal.

Batman, alter ego of Bruce Wayne a wealthy industrialist, operates in the American Gotham City.

Others speculate that Wayne may either retire from his duties or be killed by a mystery villain known as the Black Glove.

His fate will be revealed in the latest issue of DC Comic's Batman, published on 26 November.

Either way, his demise will lead to a hunt for a replacement.

"What I am doing is a fate worse than death, things that no one would expect to happen to these guys at all," Mr Morrison told Comic Book Resources.

Mr Morrison, the Scottish writer, has written storylines for comics including X-Men for Marvel and Superman for DC Comics. He took over writing the Batman series for DC in 2006.

Bruce Wayne has given up the Caped Crusader mantle once before. In the 'Knightfall' storyline, Batman's back was broken by villain Bane, causing Wayne to recruit Jean-Paul Valley to replace him.

Mr Morrison declined to reveal who the new Batman would be, but the frontrunners include Tim Drake who has been Robin since 1991 and Dick Grayson - the original Boy Wonder.

It is not the first time a superhero has met an unfortunate end in the comic world.

Last year, Captain America was killed after being shot by a sniper in New York.

Superman's death in 1992 at the hands of Doomsday became the biggest selling Superman comic in history. He was later resurrected.

Batman was co-created by artist Bob Kane and writer Bill Finger for DC Comics. The character first appeared in Detective Comics in May 1939.

MadShangi - I Am In Your Inbox

2008-11-25T16:17:00.000-08:00

MadShangi not only brings cutting edge social commentary to his blogs. MadShangi also dabbles with the realm of stupid. That's John Collins on guitar and bass, also programmed the drugs for this little experiment. The song actually had three parts that gradually got intentionally worse and worse. I blame our alcohlism. I'm probably going to regret this one leak.

The music video for MADSHANGI - I Am In Your Inbox.

Why Trekkies Really Went To See "Quantum of Solace"

2008-11-24T14:59:00.000-08:00

FROM NEW YORK OBSERVER

How have we never heard the term "internerds" before? In an interview with Entertainment Weekly, Tina Fey uses our new favorite new word to describe the hordes of opinionated internet commenters who have become an extremely vocal minority in the last few years. Brilliant, Ms. Fey! We're totally stealing that... starting now: the trailer for J.J. Abrams' reimagining of Star Trek, which premiered in front of Quantum of Solace this weekend and is now available online (in HD!), has made the internerds very, very unhappy. To put it another way, hell hath no fury like a Trekkie scorned!

A quick scan of Ain't It Cool News reveals that the natives are not only restless, but also kinda pissed. Things like "terrible trailer," "it doesn't inspire much confidence," and the ubiquitous "raped my childhood" are written with passionate fervor and the caps lock firmly engaged. Even a Trekkie that actually liked the trailer had to write that he/she wouldn't consider the upcoming film "canon".

While we happily consider ourselves part of the nerd community, we never succumbed to the Star Trek phenomenon. We always felt like Star Trek was Dungeons and Dragons but pushed into the final frontier--the whole "dressing up like your favorite character" thing is a case of nerddom run amuck. Plus, James T. Kirk was never as cool as Han Solo, even if he did come first. Yet, that being said, we think the trailer looks pretty badass. Mr. Abrams has molded his vision of Star Trek into part origin story, part Star Wars and part Michael Bay/Jerry Bruckheimer summer action blockbuster. There are car chases, explosions, and though we could do without the Phantom Menace-style space dogfight, the presence of Simon Pegg almost makes up for it. How could we not want to see this?

And that's where the disconnect lies. Mr. Abrams has made a movie for nerds like us, not nerds who still debate the merits of Star Trek: The Next Generation against Star Trek: Enterprise. But for Star Trek to be a success, he needs everyone to come out and buy a ticket, not just guys dressed like Klingons.

So if you're a Trekkie (or, if you prefer, Trekker), perhaps stardate May 8th, 2009 isn't something you're looking forward to. For the rest of us, we'll set our phasers to stun and give Mr. Abrams a chance to show us if he's the next Steven Spielberg... or Michael Bay.

FROM AINT-IT-COOL NEWS

Hey, everyone. “Moriarty” here.

So let’s talk about STAR TREK.

JJ Abrams looms large on the pop culture landscape right now. Whether you love everything he’s done or not, he’s carved out a nice piece of the pie for himself, and part of that pie right now is getting to play with the biggest train sets that Paramount has. When they offered to bring him to the movie division, they did so knowing full well what they wanted from him: franchises and events. And if something can be both at once, even better.

And there are people that sneer at the sort of thing that Abrams does right now, but I’ve been pretty vocal about this for a while... I’m fascinated. There are things he’s been associated with that I’ve hated (REGARDING HENRY, for example), that I’ve been indifferent to (FELICITY), things I’ve loved (ALIAS, LOST). I think he obviously gets what kind of heavy lifting it takes to create a successful franchise event. And again... that sounds so calculated and clinical, but it’s not. It doesn’t have to be. You can decide you want to do a certain kind of big canvas movie, and you can do it with real passion and ambition. Even when I’ve disagreed passionately with the creative direction JJ Abrams took an existing property (his SUPERMAN draft), I’ve done so because I’m engaged by the way he makes choices. He’s not fucking around when he takes a property and rebuilds it. He’s going to make radical decisions, and they might work, or they might backfire, but they’re going to be bold choices. I think M:I:III was a warm-up. I enjoyed it, but it wasn’t really reinventing the wheel. He just made a solid M:I film, which is what he needed to do, basically.

I think he’s aiming higher with STAR TREK. And I think he’s making some of those big bold choices, and doing things that you wouldn’t think he’s doing. And I think there’s a chance STAR TREK fans are going to commit mass seppuku when they hear some of what he’s up to. Which is exactly what you’d expect when you’re making big choices.

The first question is...

No, actually; the only question is: why STAR TREK?

I’m hoping I get a chance to ask JJ exactly that. I wonder if it’s the opportunity for the exploration movies down the road. If this first one goes well, he’ll be able to make STAR TREK movies for the next ten or twelve years, easy. With his track record in TV, I’m sure Paramount would let him take it back to the small screen when the film franchise goes cold again. He could be doing this for the rest of his life in one way or another.

Or maybe it’s just a one-off. He’ll make a few of these and then hand it off to someone else. I don’t know. I don’t know how much he wants to do or how little.

Certainly, STAR TREK is about as stark a set of archetypes as you could ask for when doing a remake. It all depends on hiring the right young Kirk, young Spock, and young McCoy.

Those are your big three. You need that dynamic to be perfect so everything else falls into place. Most of the big drama happens in the friction between those three personalities. So obviously the first film is going to find a way to put those three people together. Right?

Sort of. Possibly.

Okay, first thing that surprised me: I think Leonard Nimoy is sort of the star of the movie. I think a lot of this movie is about Spock. Nimoy-aged Spock, mind you.

How?

Okay... you know the scene in BACK TO THE FUTURE 2? Where Doc Brown explains alternate timelines? Well, this is sort of... ummm... TREK TO THE FUTURE, I guess you would call it...

Picture an incident that throws a group of Romulans back in time. Picture that group of Romulans figuring out where they are in the timeline, then deciding to take advantage of the accident to kill someone’s father, to erase them from the timeline before they exist, thereby changing all of the TREK universe as a result. Who would you erase? Whose erasure would leave the biggest hole in the TREK universe is the question you should be asking.

Who else, of course, but James T. Kirk?

If Spock were in a position to change that incident back, and then in a position to guard that timeline and make sure things happen the way they’re supposed to, it creates...

... well, what does it create? Because evidently the plan is to use this second timeline as a way of rebooting without erasing or ignoring canon. These new voyages of the ENTERPRISE, they’re taking place in whatever timeline starts with this story. Maybe this timeline features dramatic differences. Like... say... if Vulcan were to be blown up. If the Vulcans in the series were suddenly the last of their kind, alone in the universe, it would change who they are and maybe even redefine their strict rejection of emotion in favor of logic.

You can introduce these Universe2 versions of classic TREK events and characters, and you can play with the audience’s expectation. Things have changed. Some things play out the way you expect… some don’t. It’s basically the same solution Marvel Comics has in terms of publishing, the way they use their ULTIMATES line to reboot continuity.

As a friend said when I was talking to him about this tonight, “Wait... so you’re saying they’re not just doing a square one reboot that would simplify everything, but that they’re actually making it... more complicated?”

It would appear so. Not that I think TREK fans mind complicated. It’s certainly not the safest choice if this is, in fact, the direction he goes with the film.

I’m not telling you that anything I said above is 100% set in stone. I don’t think Abrams is far enough along for that to be the case yet. But they are considering some really crazy reinventions, on par with some of the choices Abrams was making on SUPERMAN.

Who was the original captain of the ENTERPRISE?

I know the answer to that question in the canon STAR TREK universe right now... but will it be the same in the Abrams TREK universe?

Can you fundamentally alter one or more of the characters in that main trio, and still expect the same chemistry when you put the three characters together?

That’s the real question Abrams is going to have to face when he reveals his TREK next Christmas. I think you’d have to be crazy to bet against him, and I’m intrigued by some of these decisions, but I’m also willing to bet that even details as vague as the ones I’ve reported here today will cause a fair bit of debate. Abrams certainly doesn’t take low-profile gigs, and I guess that’s one of the reasons he’s gotten so good at trying to engage the audience early or in unconventional media ways. I’ll be curious to see how he gets the public ready for his version of TREK. What the images are we see first. How he sets the visual tone for the world. I hope it’s very classic TREK. I hope that’s something they embrace. The greatest visual representation of that ‘60s version of the universe, all Roddenberry optimistic with big giant philosophical ambition. Pop that aims a little higher. The Abrams sweet spot.

I’m sure we’ll have more on this as it develops.

Let the talkbacks begin!

My BangMe Score is 91%

2008-11-24T02:25:00.000-08:00

Yep, it's true. I'm a very sexy man. That's why some people choose to be fixated on me, and follow me wherever I go. Aw, well. That's the life of an internet superstar like MadShangi.

A Special E-mail From "Amoussou Andre"

2008-11-24T02:04:00.000-08:00

I found this message in my JUNK MAIL folder.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Dear Friend,
(TRANSFER OF US$14,000,000)
Please do not be surprise the way i got your contact. It is obvious that this proposal will come to you as a surprise. This is because we have not meet before but i am inspired to send you this email by the huge fund transfer opportunity that will be of mutual benefit to both of us.

First Let me start by introducing myself properly to you. I am AMOUSSOU ANDRE ,Credit officer TRUST FINACIAL COMPANY here in cotonou.I believe that you will not betrayed me at last with the trust i intend putting on you now.

THE PROPOSITION

A foreigner, a Libyian,Late Engr. MAHMUD ALI IBRAHIM (snr)An iron steel company chairman with the Federal Government here in Benin until his death some years ago in a plain crash and he Deposited with us some amount of money worth US$14,000,000(Fourteen million United States Dollars),the company now expects a next of kin as beneficiary of this money and Valuable efforts are being made by TRUST FINACIAL COMPANY to get in touch with any of the MAHMUD ALI'S family or relatives but to no avail.

It is because of the perceived possibility of not being able to locate any of Late Engr MAHMUD ALI IBRAHIM (snr)'s next of kin (he had no wife or children that is known to us).The management under the influence of our chairman and members of the board of directors, have made arrangements for the fund to be declared "Unclaimed» and subsequently be used to import ammunitions into our country.

However, In order to avert this negative development, some of my trusted colleagues and I, now seek your permission to have you stand as next of kin to late Engr MAHMUD ALI IBRAHIM (snr) so that the fund US$14,000,000 will be released and transferred into your account as the beneficiary.

All documents and proofs to enable you get this fund has been carefully worked out. We have secured from the probate an order of mandamus to locate any of the deceased beneficiaries, and more so, we are assuring you that this business is 100% risk free evolvement. Your share remains while the rest will be for myself and my colleagues for investment purposes anywhere according to agreement between we and your good self. So as soon as we receive an acknowledgement of the receipt of this our mutual business proposal from you, we would furnish you with the necessary disbursement ratio to suite both parties.

If this proposal is acceptable by you, do not hesitate to contact me through my private e-mail: amoussouandre09@live.comLooking forward to your urgent response.

Best regards, Amoussou Andre.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
HA! HA! What the fuck?!?!

"Julian Real"

2008-11-23T22:35:00.001-08:00

Julian Real, you're a punk
Faking down Fake Street, fake in the funk
You're a bitch, whiny man-child little snitch
MadShangi says “Fuck what you pitch!”
You're a bitch, and you're just like a pony
giving kid's rides, 'cause you sad and lonely
You think you own me, but I own you
Grow some balls, bitch – 'cause I own two
Your life is through, 'cause you try to hang me
But, you punk: you can't fuck with MadShangi
I can say what I wanna say, 'cause it's my blog
And if you don't like it, you can go fuck the dog
Cause I know you do anyway
If the dog shits, eat it, 'cause fuck what you say
You publish my name, so I'm a publish yours
'Cause punks like you are just like cold sores
Pussy, it's time to smarten up, you little wussy
MadShangi says: “Fuck this Little Tootsie!”
I may be no Vanilla Ice, but I don't give fuck
MadShangi just showed up 'cause you suck
Call the cops, coward 'cause you're overpowered
Get devoured! 'Cause your milk has soured
I've broken no laws, and my records are clean
Julian Real is just venting his spleen
Sit down, take it like a man, Peter Pan, Neverland
'cause you've just been shit-canned
So you was touched when you were little
It's not like I'm unsympathetic...
But that's no excuse for you to be this pathetic
Stop. Now. And seek some help, get your head checked
'Cause the shit you write is mind-wrecked
Bullshit – motherfucker, pull shit – let's expose it
Gangster-fronting feminized boy, that fronts to pose it
I know what your last name is, but I'm the one that's Real
So deal! And like a pig you will squeal for your meal
That's your appeal, Julian Real

Julian Real Is A Quitter

2008-11-23T21:25:00.000-08:00

This is the latest posting from Julian Real's "Radical Profeminist" blog.

A Radical Profeminist: Bye-bye Men's Rights Brethren

To John Dias, cybro, Kapt Krunch, Fidelbogen, MadShangi, Frostyboy, Anti Misandry, and all the other Father's Rights/Men's Rights/Antifeminist Activists out there:

It has been brought to my attention by a colleague that all the arguments you put forth have already been answered sufficiently (see below). Therefore, I decided it would be an utter waste of cyberspace to further engage you on those subjects here.

Since you don't seem to know it, I'll inform you that you are a group of very privileged human beings who are utterly clueless about the living conditions and lack of privileges most people in the world--who aren't you--live with, endure, and often don't survive.

When you are, from your points of view, unfairly treated, or falsely accused--sometimes by one woman in your past--this "affront" generates in far too many of you the most self-righteous, scathing, and scornful written assaults on women, especially feminists, with a particularly foolish level of deranged irrationality focused on radical feminists.

These sorts of ego-bruises--assuming the occasional personal injustice done to some of you--to which you are apparently not at all accustomed, is but one indication of the enormous amount of privilege you carry day to day. (Most women I know are treated unfairly every day of their lives.

You give humanity a bad name. So much for the myth of white men being western civilisation's standard of sanity, honesty, and integrity.

Let the record show that, to date, my questions to antimisandrists have never been answered. I gave John Dias his requested two days to reply here, and he did not choose to do so.

I apologise to the anti-misogynist visitors here for giving those men as much attention as I have.

I'll close this post with the following quotes, correspondence, and this important link (a website from which all of what follows was found). What is blockquoted below, in addition to the other information found at the link just above, thoroughly exposes many of the distortions and lies Fathers' Rights and Men's Rights Groups are organised to promote and promulgate.

Robert Okun, a specialist in men's issues and domestic violence, pointed out that many of today’s dads, whether married, never-married or divorced, are doing their best to stay actively involved in their children’s lives. But of men in the organized father’s rights movement, who typically represent themselves as the innocent victims of gender discrimination and manipulative ex-wives, Okun writes: "Some may very well be getting a raw deal. If so, it is essential that divorce lawyers, psychotherapists, family service court officers, mediators, guardians ad litem and judges educate themselves about those circumstances and take steps to intervene when a man has been erroneously targeted as part of a strategy in a contentious custody complaint. However, in a dangerously high number of cases, many of these fathers have a documented history of abuse."

[C]oncerned citizens who've taken the time to investigate the activities of father's rights groups in greater depth -- notably Trish Wilson, a freelance writer who considers exposing the shady underside of the father's custody movement her part-time job. Ms. Wilson first became curious about the movement when she stumbled into a father's rights message board on AOL ten years ago. When she questioned the accuracy of child support statistics posted on the board, Ms. Wilson reports she was "attacked by the regulars there. The woman who had posted the original out-of-context quotes told me that I believed all women should have custody of their children because they had uteruses, which is nonsense. There were similar, ugly flames thrown at me by others. I was taken aback at how nasty they were." Since then, Ms. Wilson has conducted extensive research reviews and produced a series of articles disputing the studies and data father's rights advocates use to justify their intention to overhaul child custody and support laws.

Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 06:12:26 -0500 (CDT)
From: enclosed@mo.net
To: liz
Subject: Re: SMH

Liz,

One evening I was sitting at dinner with a man who stated "Women don't understand abstract justice." I said, "What do you mean by that?"

He said, "They can only see the world through relationships, and that is all that matters to them."

Thanks for proving his point.

Look for this man's book coming out this year, "The Case for Father Custody." [5]

Liz, a man is very interested in raising his progeny, not somebody elses.

"Organisms have evolved to expend their very lives enhancing the fitness prospects of their descendants. Parental investment is a precious resource, and selection must favor those parental psyches that do not squander it on nonrelatives." --Daly and Wilson, 1988.

Nick

LIZ'S RESPONSE:

I see you've run out of arguments and now have descended into thinly veiled insults, i.e. telling me (a lawyer), that (being a woman) I do not understand "justice," as well as resorting to sloganism, and the "authoritative fallacy," i.e. quoting others, who are to be given extra credence because their words have been published.

You go on to say: "A man is very interested in raising his progeny not somebody elses."

I have a question back. It's "why?" Why do you think so? Are you sure it's RAISING that progeny and not merely passing on genes?

My response to you is this: catering to an adult's ego is just not a priority consideration. It has nothing whatever to do with the interests of a child. If you believe a parental DNA connection is a motivating thing, well that speaks volumes.

We're talking "possession" here, as in property, as in "mine." And "molding" here as in "indoctrination into my beliefs." Not caregiving. Not a child perspective. But self-adoration and replication. If the biological connection alone was so motivating, how is it we have the numbers of nonmarital unions and bad marriages we have? what about adoptive parents? what about sperm donors? I'll agree with you that some men think this way. I just don't buy it as some naturally arising drive, and even as a result of social indoctrination, I don't buy it as a given.

But let's accept your theory for the sake of argument. If a biological father's ostensible natural interest is in raising his own progeny, that interest nevertheless still is unlikely to compare favorably with the gestating mother's interest. She's got the very same biological connection, PLUS the biological relationship in fact with the child! And how is the father's interest later on demonstrated? Who is more likely to be the primary caregiver?

"The Case For Father Custody?" Nonsense. By your own measure, natural mothers' parenting generally would come out on top on both counts: your "abstract justice" theory, as well as my real life relationship preservation.

In one breath you've pretended (that male superiority thing?) that "women don't understand abstract justice," and then implicitly called upon nature, quoting talk about about organism evolution. Evolutionarily, the male reproductive drive in species the world over is merely to pass on the genes, not to raise the children. Most organisms also have evolved such that mothers raise their young.

And what about your "abstract justice?" Life is not lived in the abstract, and some men's egos are just not the sum total of what counts.

This is really what the FR movement is about, isn't it. Children and women as men's possessions. The ideology of property rights. Patriarchy. It has nothing whatever to do with the well-being of children.

By the way. Clarence Darrow, a famous man lawyer well known for his righting of wrongs, had this to say about "abstract justice": there is no such thing, in or out of court.

liz

I just got a call from my mother a few minutes ago. She had just been reading my blog, and decided to give me a call late at night. I was glad, I was worried it would have been someone I didn't want to talk to: like a bill collector, Tele-Marketer, or my employers.

"I just want to say 'kudos' to you for holding your own against that Julian Real guy," she said, "I'm so proud of you. He surfs around policing other people's opinions and threatening to call the cops. He's insane! I was writing you an e-mail and said 'fuck it," I'll just give you a call. Oh, and I noticed on one of your videos that your tower was maiking like a... siren sound... and I think I know how to fix it..."

Thanks, mom. And I just got your e-mail. I'll check it out. ;)

Oh, and for those of you liked my posted gangsta rap lyrics. You'll love this.

Julian Real, you're a punk
Faking down Fake Street, fake in the funk
You're a bitch, whiny man-child little snitch
MadShangi says “Fuck what you pitch!”
You're a bitch, and you're just like a pony
giving kid's rides, 'cause you sad and lonely
You think you own me, but I own you
Grow some balls, bitch – 'cause I own two
Your life is through, 'cause you try to hang me
But, you punk: you can't fuck with MadShangi
I can say what I wanna say, 'cause it's my blog
And if you don't like it, you can go fuck the dog
Cause I know you do anyway
If the dog shits, eat it, 'cause fuck what you say
You publish my name, so I'm a publish yours
'Cause punks like you are just like cold sores
Pussy, it's time to smarten up, you little wussy
MadShangi says: “Fuck this Little Tootsie!”
I may be no Vanilla Ice, but I don't give fuck
MadShangi just showed up 'cause you suck
Call the cops, coward 'cause you're overpowered
Get devoured! 'Cause your milk has soured
I've broken no laws, and my records are clean
Julian Real is just venting his spleen
Sit down, take it like a man, Peter Pan, Neverland
'cause you've just been shit-canned
So you was touched when you were little
It's not like I'm unsympathetic...
But that's no excuse for you to be this pathetic
Stop. Now. And seek some help, get your head checked
'Cause the shit you write is mind-wrecked
Bullshit – motherfucker, pull shit – let's expose it
Gangster-fronting feminized boy, that fronts to pose it
I know what your last name is, but I'm the one that's Real
So deal! And like a pig you will squeal for your meal
That's your appeal, Julian Real

Ha! Ha! That was cathartic for me. It really was. Julian, you're a fucking quitter. You really are. Oh, and by the way... who reads your shit anyway but us? So I say goodbye to you too, and poo-poo, for you get no kiss for you boo-boo. Sucker!

"Let the record show that, to date, my questions to antimisandrists have never been answered. I gave John Dias his requested two days to reply here, and he did not choose to do so." - Julian Real

MARX - Antimisandry.com Forum Admin

I couldn't be blessed to read beyond that point, because he is undeniably lying through his teeth. John's repsonse is pasted to this thread and Julian seems to be unwilling to allow John's post (at Julian's blog) to be approved or has been deleted in order to serve as 'evidence' of his (Julian's) claim (that John did not reply).

Let's assume worst case scenario here though, and give Julian benefit of the doubt: We know, by Julian's own admission, that he misrepresented his claim to have presented questions to antimisandry.com members. Instead, he had posted questions elsewhere. They were then pasted in Kim's blog, which is mirrored here.

Now Julian presents this as him "asking antimisandry.com members a questions and they did not answer my questions".

See the difference folks?

Regardless though, Julian knew that his questions were contained in here - and he considers their very presense reason enough to justify a claim against antimisandry.com.

Fine.

So, even *if* John had not answered at Julian's blog - his answer still exists here, on antimisandry.com

If Julian can anticipate that we should 'just know' he expected us to answer his question, being as they existed here - surely the same logic works for John's response...

Or is it different this time around, because it doesn't suit the obvious agenda?

Here's JD's answers to Julian, anyway.

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Dias

Since he dedicated a post specifically to letting me give our side of the story, I posted the following comment on his blog today.

- - - - - - - - -

I did a search on AntiMisandry, and found a post in which you were quoted. The quote was taken from a comment that you left on a post at the blog of Rex Patriarch. That post on Rex Patriarch was written in response to a Washington Times article entitled, "Calling for truce in War of the Sexes," which is a book review of "Save the Males: Why Men Matter, Why Women Should Care" by Kathleen Parker.

So it seems that this is the chronology:

1. Kathleen Parker writes a pro-male book, entitled "Save the Males," in 2008.

2. Washington Times columnist Larry Thornberry writes a column on July 20, 2008, which is favorable to Parker's pro-male book.

3. Cybro, owner of the Rex Patriarch MRA-oriented blog, quotes liberally from the Washington Times article, using the quotes to illustrate how radical feminism has unjustly demonized innocent boys and men for the actions of a few.

4. Julianreal (you) comments on Cybro's blog posting on July 24, 2008, and is subsequently and summarily dismissed by Cybro as a feminist ideologue and likely women's studies graduate.

5. Kim, a pro-male female blogger who is also a member at AntiMisandry.com, creates a thread that quotes from and lambastes Julianreal's comment on the Rex Patriarch blog post.

6. Julianreal creates a post on his blog entitled, "Antimisandry.com: An Introduction," dated November 12, 2008. The post seems to be critical of the MRA-oriented site AntiMisandry.com. However, Julianreal cites no examples of objectionable content on AntiMisandry.com, and instead links to

Athough the title of Julianreal's article is "Antimisandry.com: An introduction," not one example is provided of writing on the site. The only links provided to the site pertain to the average age and full listing of the site's membership. What is critiqued is the general outlook of the site: AntiMisandry.com opposes misandry (the teaching of contempt for males in popular culture). The theme of Julianreal's post concedes that it's possible that wrong can be done to men, and that when it happens it's wrong.

7. I, John Dias, respond with a comment on that same day (November 12, 2008), inviting Julianreal to ask me any questions.

8. On November 19, Julianreal creates this post, offers me the opportunity to comment on the question that he believes he posed back in July to the community at AntiMisandry.com.

So here I am. As you can see by the above chronology, your post was not made on AntiMisandry.com, but rather on the blog of Rex Patriarch. You made a comment in response to a blog posting that was in response to a book review that was in response to a book. None of this had anything remotely to do with AntiMisandry.com. So let's be clear on that: you were not ignored, nor mistreated.

So these questions that you would now have me answer were not even directed to our site. Nevertheless, since you've given me the opportunity to represent AntiMisandry.com and our outlook, I'm happy to do so.

Your comment referred to an article on the IndianCountry.com Web site, entitled, "Sexual violence against indigenous women discussed at United Nations," published May 18, 2007. The link to the article that you originally cited no longer works, but I dug up the article via Archive.org.

Before I begin responding to your questions, I would like to comment on the above article which you used as their basis:

I would say that the greater issue is that the well-being of any community depends on the preservation of the intact 2-parent family, preferably in a close-knit community of families, in which the natural abilities of women to nurture the members of the family are complemented by the abilities of men to nurture that family's survival. Here's a YouTube video that illustrates this perspective eloquently:

Pt. 6: Introduction to Patriarchy

By Elder George

I believe that a community of families as described above is nurturing and healthy, because it is made safe and secure (by the men) and its members are nurtured (by the women). It is governments which disrupt this delicate and natural balance, but not just governments. Cultural decay can do it too. The intact 2-parent family can mitigate the impact of anti-family influences, but a 1-parent mother-only family cannot do it alone, at least not as effectively.

Again, I point you to the video below, which extols the value of ensuring the safety of women, but emphasizes that men will be most motivated to do this when women in turn nurture the men and the family. The security provided to women by men means that such men are putting their lives on the line for those who they love. Hatred of men, and sidelining male influence in the family and culture, only breaks down the family, hence leaving women more vulnerable:

Pt. 6: Introduction to Patriarchy

By Elder George

Oh, please. Like her culture has absolutely no concept of women being raped. Who is responsible for the raping, then, if indigenous peoples simply have no concept of it? Why of course, the Western white males! Never mind that Ghenkis Khan, a member of a Mongol tribe (indigenous, I'd say), is famous for lopping of the heads of his vanquished and stacking them in huge piles. He must not have gotten the memo on the inherent peacefulness of indigenous people who hadn't yet been subdued by the Western hordes.

Now, on to your questions.

I suppose that you expect me to tell you that we need a halt to Western industrial colonialism, or some such left-wing ideology. I will simply say that we need a restoration of intact 2-parent families, and from that will come both personal security as well as an increase in personal modesty. The family is the answer, and hyper-industrialization along with hyper-consumerism does tend to turn our culture in a somewhat narcissistic direction, in my view. That's why innocent people (not just indigenous peoples) are hurting -- from violence, yes, but also from loneliness, isolation, and poor substitutes for group-belonging (gangs, etc.).

In schools, women comprise the vast majority of teachers. Normal behavior by boys is misinterpreted by these women as disruptive, and as a result, boys are falling behind in academic achievement. Colleges now have a major gender gap between female and male graduates, which I believe is partly due to the female-dominated education that boys have been subjected to throughout elementary and primary school.

The point of your question seems to be that female domination is not possible if females are not actually making the decisions, and occupying the positions of political and financial power. You probably won't agree with this, but elected leaders place a lot of value on not offending the female electorate. The business world also recognizes the spending power of women and caters to win their business. So you can see that women are more than capable of exerting their influence via proxy.

Whether it is stereotypical or not, it is a business, and to the extent that the participants are engaged voluntarily, on what basis would you limit it? Sure it's degrading, but it's degrading to humanity. If women are portrayed in pornography as sexual objects, certainly the men in such videos are unfairly "representing" men too.

What demonstrates a cultural sickness is not the existence of pornography, but rather the demand for it. If men and women were able to unite outside the influence of a hyper-sexualized culture, their sexual needs would be met. Pornography exists because men, who are expected to initiate romantic relations, are mocked for their failed attempts at romance (at one extreme) or are vilified as potential rapists (on the other extreme). So, facing such suppression and demonization of male sexuality, such men turn to artificial means of getting their rocks off. In the process, they run the risk of associating women in general with the women they see portrayed in pornographic material.

Here's a suggestion: let's stop painting manhood and masculinity as irrelevant at best, and threatening at worst. Let's celebrate men and manhood for a change, rather than making men out to be abject fools. If manhood is just a continuum of "affable doofus" on one extreme and "competent menace" on the other extreme, our boys won't have much positive to look forward to. Porn is a symptom of the problem of misandry. In summary, misogyny is the effect of porn, but misandry causes the demand.

The family courts, family court mediators, family court psych evaluators, child protective services, divorce attorneys, trial lawyers... And those are just dealing with the legal sphere. Then there are the media mavens and their sponsors, with their misandric portrayals of men. Where do we see realistic and plausible men portrayed as heroes, providers, protectors, competent, and yes, sexual (in a positive way)? This is rare. It's the result of decision makers in powerful positions (political, judicial, cultural, financial, and commercial), all reducing human beings -- BOTH men and women -- into caricatures and commodities.

Despite the fact that men compose 38 percent of all domestic violence injuries, there are no shelters devoted to men. Despite the fact that a significant body of research reveals that men suffer from domestic violence at similar rates to women, little attention is devoted to this fact (you'd think acknowledgment of male-victimization would be higher, since more men than women are elected officials). And of course, we have men being 98 percent of war dead, plus a requirement that only men must register for the draft (women are exempt, although Obama has indicated a willingness to change this). Men comprise over 90 percent of work-related injuries. But we have no "Office of Men's Health." Do you see how men's pain is being ignored, or merely acknowledged as a part of being a man? I have a son, and I'll be damned before I have to tell him that he's in for domestic violence, work-related injury, and eventually being a war casualty all because that's just what it means for a boy to become a man. Forget that!

Anti-misandrists are trying to highlight the negative effects of the above phenomenon on men. That's not to say that we intend to ignore female suffering. But someone has to be a voice for the pain that men feel, and the cultural isolation that we experience. We are that voice.

No, I don't know that many female victims of such crimes. I guess those atrocities must not be so widespread as you suggested, since I haven't encountered as many victims as you have. Perhaps your ideology has helped you to seek them out, or perhaps they seek you out. Or perhaps, you don't really know the whole story. Or maybe, in particular cases, there never was an atrocity.

I would surmise that you woke up one morning and decided to hug the entire oppressed world, and noticing the world's ambivalence, you can't figure out why they are not joining with you in the worldwide hug- and cry-fest. You conclude that they're reinforcing the oppression.

You have fallen victim to an ideology.

Oh, I do! I very much do! I referred earlier to men in power placing high emphasis on pleasing the female electorate and female consumers, giving women influence-by-proxy. But let's take a much less conceptual example. See what kind of reaction you get if you talk in mixed company about a man who has been beaten by his wife. What kind of reaction will you get from your male listeners? The answer is that a significant portion of them will scoff, calling such a man either a wimp, or a tyrant who somehow deserved it.

Male pain is not a politically correct subject. We must always go back to the continuum of men as either affable-yet-impotent, or potent-yet-menacing. Nowhere can male pain simply be acknowledged.

Here's another short video. It's only 5 minutes, but I encourage you to watch it. Please reply with YOUR reaction to it:

"Men's Issues" video

Boy's and the Boy Crisis Conference, July 13-14, 2007
http://www.trueequality.com/video.html

It seems that you are concluding that women don't hate men, and that if they are hostile, it's a reaction to the male-imposed victimization that they have endured. Again with the ideology.

I'm not sure what you mean by "social experiences." At first I thought you wanted me to cite personal experiences, but you want the "large scale." I believe that I have provided some examples above. Especially the "Men's Issues" video.

I can give you a glimpse into what catalyzed me personally to get involved in the men's movement. I have a Web site of my own, apart from AntiMisandry.com, and on that site I tell my story. Take a look at where I'm coming from. Also, if you're interested, here are some other men's stories. We are unhappy, some of us angry, about the way men have been treated in our culture and under our laws. Have the courage to acknowledge our perspective, and don't think that doing so is to invalidate women's pain.

"Aren't white men the Nazis?" Are you serious? Don't ask a question like this -- especially in a rhetorical way (thinking that the obvious answer is to agree with your ideology) -- and expect me to proffer a dignifying response.

Next question.

More about the "feminazi" word. I don't use that word, but I know some who do, and their use of the term refers to those feminists who are ideologically hostile to men as a biological group.

Well, like I linked to earlier, I was falsely accused.

Then there was the year-long mind-washing program that I was required to take after accepting a plea bargain for my Ex's false allegation.

But that's not all. Last year, I learned that my Ex (who shares child custody with me) was dealing drugs out of her home, and letting the drug dealer live with her and spank my son. I learned that her plan was not to report on him, but rather kidnap our son and move off to another state, on the pretext that it was all a "vacation." I brought this to the attention of Child Protective Services (CPS), the police department, the Sheriff department, the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, all of whom refused to take a report (except CPS, who said that if they did take a report, they would remove my son not just from his mom's home, but also from mine). Finally I took the case to a judge in an ex-parte hearing. He told my son's mother to stay away from drugs and to keep our son in town. But that was it. He referred the case to family court, and washed his hands of it. A couple days later, my Ex falsely accused me of threatening her, and sought a restraining order. I hired an attorney for thousands of dollars, then weeks later, on the day of the hearing for the restraining order, my Ex didn't even show up. The female judge dismissed the case, shaking her head. I had spent thousands of dollars in my defense, and all of this (the false allegation) was simply a way for my Ex to deflect attention from the drug dealing that she had been involved in. All that drama was for nothing, and I was out thousands of dollars in attorney fees for it. I was trying to protect our son, and I paid dearly for it.

These types of incidents are very common in divorce and child custody proceedings. Where the court steps in, the delicate bonds that exist between fathers and kids are disturbed, and often completely cut off. Mothers are connected to their kids through child birth. But fathers are connected to their kids only by their emotional commitment; they could have impregnated the mother and then vanished. But sticking around is a noble decision, and even when fathers want to remain involved with their kids after a divorce, the family court treats the father's involvement as superfluous. "Just pay that child support check," the court tells fathers, "and you can have dinner with your kids a couple times a month. Oh, and don't complain about it either." When sole child custody is contested, over 90 percent of the time the family court awards it to the mother. This is devastating to both fathers and children, in my view. And the motivation for judges to make such rulings is misandry, which we identify and combat, at AntiMisandry.com and other places.

Well, I hope this answers your question. I ran down the links you provided, read through not only that article on IndianCountry.com, but also read through various other articles on the site that the article linked to, IndigenousWomensForum.org. This included declarations they submitted to the United Nations, such as this one, this one, and this one. I read them all, to get a good understanding of where you're coming from. Now I challenge you to do the same.

Take a look at all the links and videos that I have referenced in this reply (especially the videos on Men's Issues and Patriarchy. Do some research on my position, as I did on yours. Look into what we opponents of misandry believe. You don't necessarily have to agree with it, but I challenge you to look.

ChristianJ - Australian Men's News

Quote:

"The Case For Father Custody?" Nonsense. By your own measure, natural mothers' parenting generally would come out on top on both counts: your "abstract justice" theory, as well as my real life relationship preservation.

Amongst that other drivel from ranting hysterical LIZ, we have another sexist lie..

Women do not do a better job at raising children as studies have already clearly demonstrated but they are just assumed they can..

Use google you sexist dimwit and get you're facts straight. Not the standard twisted hysterical femispeak response..

KIM - Antimisandry.com Forum Member

CD posted about this earlier on this thread,

Antimisandry.com: An Introduction

I noticed the same thing Marx did and, according to CD who had scanned through Julian's blog, there's no sign of John Dias's post there. So, either, through some error or glitch, John's post never made it on to the blog or (more likely) it was deleted and Mr. Real is now claiming that John never responded.

John Dias - DontMakeHerMad.com

Oh, I posted alright -- within 1 day of the comment that he allowed me to make on there. He's lying about how I never responded. He just didn't want to look like an idiot after he excoriated AntiMisandry.com, then had to admit that it wasn't AntiMisandry.com that dismissed him after all, then had to face the mockery once again when I made my post (duplicated here).

I schooled that sucker.

PETA at Large!

2008-11-22T20:12:00.000-08:00

Papers won't run PETA ad linked to Pickton case

Papers won't run PETA ad linked to Pickton case
Updated Thu. Nov. 14 2002 12:41 PM ET

CTV News Staff

Two Vancouver newspapers have refused to run an advertisement that likens the treatment of animals to the fate of women allegedly murdered on a British Columbia pig farm.

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) is a U.S.-based advocacy group with a history of creating controversial ads denouncing the eating of meat. Its latest campaign makes reference to the case of 63 missing women abducted from Vancouver's Downtown Eastside neighbourhood and alleged evidence found on Robert Pickton's Port Coquitlam pig farm.

Pickton has been charged with 15 counts of first-degree murder in connection with the case.

One section of the ad that was to have run Thursday, reads: "They were drugged and dragged across the room... Their struggles and cries went unanswered... They were slaughtered and their heads sawed off... Their body parts were refrigerated... Their bones were discarded."

It's thought the PETA campaign was intended to coincide with Pickton's preliminary hearing, which had been scheduled for Monday but has been put on hold.

Pickton is not mentioned by name in the ad but he is mentioned in a news release issued by PETA.

"PETA has just released a print ad that illustrates the well-established connection between animal abuse and acts of severe violence against people, and compares what is done to animals on factory farms and slaughterhouses to the ways in which accused serial killer Robert William Pickton apparently dealt with his human victims," says the press release.

"PETA believes that Pickton’s job as a pig killer could easily have numbed him to the cries of animals who felt his knife," the release continues.

The group says the ad is similar to one that PETA ran in the Des Moines [Iowa] Register a decade ago during convicted serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer’s trial.

Family of victims are disgusted by the association.

"All they're talking about is the pain of the animals, they don't care about the pain of the families," said Laurie Isberg. "They're torturing us. They're torturing us like they say everybody tortures animals."

"The parallels in this case are very clear," said PETA spokesman Andrew Butler. "What happened to the unfortunate victims of this crime are happening every single day in pig farms around the world where animals are routinely mutilated."

PETA bought a full-page ad in Thursday's edition of The Vancouver Province. But the company that publishes the newspaper, Pacific Newspaper Group, said Tuesday it would not run the ad in either the Province or The Vancouver Sun.

It's believed to be the first time a Canadian company has refused to run a PETA ad. The newspaper says it will refund PETA in full. Simon Fraser University marketing professor Lindsay Meredith said pulling the ads was the right decision.

"This is in poor taste," he said. "You don't take the destruction of 50 lives and use that to push your product."

PETA says it will try to force the newspapers to run the ads.

PETA Compares Murdered Women to Meat
Run Date: 11/30/02

(WOMENSENEWS)

--An animal rights organization, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, recently launched an ad campaign that compared the deaths of 15 Canadian women murdered and dismembered to animals killed for meat.

An alleged serial killer Robert Pickton is currently facing trial for the deaths of the 15 women who disappeared in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside in the mid-1980s. Pickton is accused of dismembering his victims and storing their body parts in a freezer on his small, non-commercial pig farm.

While the ads did not specifically name Robert Pickton, they mentioned alleged details of the crimes of which he is accused, and suggested the actions were akin to farm animals killed for food, according to Canadian newspaper reports.

PETA pulled the print ad campaign this week--along with plans for upcoming television spots--after receiving negative comments from the public. At least one Canadian newspaper refused to run the ads.

In a statement, PETA President Ingrid Newkirk said the ad was meant to show the "horror and fear of the 'serial killings' going on every day in slaughter houses and on pig farms."

PETA is best known for running ads of barely concealed, naked women in their anti-fur ads, which feature the slogan: "I'd rather go naked than wear fur."

Why Most Vegans Are Usally Stupid

First off - sorry sorry sorry I have not written anything on here for a long time. I just kind of ran out of important things I felt motivated to write about but now all that has changed and I'm back with a buzz!
There's something I have been wanting to put into writing for quite sometime and that is why most vegans are usually stupid. I don't mean they have a brain the size of a pea or anything no - it's more that they don't use their brain (however big it may be) to consider their ecological footprint. The vegans I have met are fairly self righteous about their lifestyle and often feel certain that the way they live their life leaves the smallest ecological footprint on the earth. Usually I find they have failed to consider several major factors. Just because you eat vegetables and no animal products doesn't mean your diet is totally eco-friendly. While it's true that for every pound of meat you could grow many times more vegetables therefore using up less resources - eating a carrot for example may have required an unknown number of unenvironmentally friendly things (including animal cruelty) to happen before it got to your mouth.

The things I try to consider are:

1) Were any chemicals used which may have had detrimental impacts on the surrounding environment? - most artificial fertilizers and pesticides are damaging to wildlife and humans so I buy organic produce whenever possible. However, although a product may be "organic" that does NOT mean that dead animals were not used to grow it (fish and bone fertilizer - hmm?) and that the fertilizers used were from sustainable sources.

2) Is the product fair trade? - it's often difficult to find fair trade products but I when I see them I always buy them instead of similar items which are not fair trade.

3) Are there any genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in it? - I avoid GMOs because the potential and proven environmental disadvantages outweigh the mostly unproved advantages.

4) How far has this product travelled? - I try to buy local produce as much as possible and avoid imported foods from a long way away. The environmental impacts (most notably C02 emissions) of food transportation are a major factor when considering your ecological footprint.

I also try to apply similar ethics to buying clothes and other products although it's not so easy finding things like organic cotton in local shops - especially in small places like Bermuda. Vegans however, boast about the fact that they don't wear wool or leather but what about their plastic shoes and their cotton shirts? There is more to being an ethical consumer than simply drawing a line between plants and animals. I do take my hat off to any vegan who buys local organic produce and wears natural organic clothes. However, most of the vegans I have met do not consider the things I have listed to be as important as the issues involved in livestock farming.

I am totally against livestock farming on land (especially factory farming but when it comes to the sea - as long it's sustainable and doesn't involve needless cruelty - I'm buying it! Of course my oceanic diet is fairly restricted because these days we're overfishing and depleting the oceans of life *rolls eyes* so there isn't much you can eat from the sea without a guilty conscience. However, local line caught fish together farmed mussels and tilapia are usually the best options. I'll talk more about them another time - but trust me on this - mussels - unless they are dredged - are like ZERO ecological footprint seafood ;-) and in my opinion are way better to eat than most vegetable sources of protein.

I know that vegans think I am cruel for eating fish that have no doubt suffered pain but when you destroy native flora and fauna in order to grow vegetables - is that not cruel and shouldn't it be avoided as much as possible? Sure we waste a lot of land growing animals and I am against that but it's even better to eat mussels and locally caught fish than it is to eat tofu... unless you consider killing fish and mussels a terrible sin - in which case - you would really need to find out where all your vegetables are coming from because you'll find that lots of animals died or suffered along the way - and I just don't know how you could justify eating anything unless you were a fruitarian that grew all your own organic fruit and if you were - I'd want to meet you and shake your hand to make sure you were real!)

Scientists Prove Plants Feel Pain, Vegans Face Starvation

DALLAS--Research scientists at Baylor Medical Center have proven that plants, including vegetables, feel pain when subjected to trauma such as being yanked out of the ground, peeled, cooked, and eaten. "Veggies and plants initiate a massive hormone and chemical barrage internally when they suffer any kind of injury," says professor Barry Lindzer. "This response is akin to the nerve response and endorphin release when an animal is injured. We cannot ignore the similarities." When Tarnish asked professor Lindzer and his research team what they thought this finding might mean, they responded unanimously, "Nobel prize, baby!"

Other agencies, namely People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals and the sum total of the world's hard-core vegetarians (known as vegans) registered formal complaints against the research. Their team of lawyers has already submitted a motion to have the results of the research destroyed or sealed. Others fear the damage has already been done. A spokesman for PETA said, "This is bad for us. Most of our members haven't eaten anything since hearing about the results. Our lawyers are looking into suing Mother Earth for false advertising, but concede that the suit will probably be inconclusive. In the meantime we'll be surviving on vitamin supplements and water."

In an ironic related story, a dozen PETA protesters picketing the Hungry Carnivore Steak House in New York City were allegedly assaulted by three patrons of the restaurant. Eyewitnesses say that the picketers were making their typical nuisance display of scorn and righteous indignation over the willful consumption of "the flesh of murdered animals" outside the Hungry Carnivore when two unidentified men and a woman stepped out of the establishment and sprayed the picketers with several gallons of what appeared to be blood. Victims and bystanders alike were surprised to discover that the liquid was actually V-8 juice. The truly shocking result of the alleged attack was the reaction of the picketers. All of the PETA protesters were wracked with convulsions and suffered hours of dry heaves while many of the bystanders merely laughed. This reaction within vegetarianism's great bastion of faith has many true believers reconsidering their dietary requirements. Others are quietly making funeral arrangements and the Environmental Protection Agency is considering declaring vegans an endangered species.

Fuck The Christmas Party

2008-11-22T19:50:00.001-08:00

My work is having a Christmas party. They think I'm going to go? No, they can go to hell. Fuck their Christmas party. I hope Santa gives them coal in all their stockings. Fuck them for making teenagers as our supervisors. Fucking half-wits.

This is MadShangi wishing you fucking clowns a very Merry Christmas!

MadShangi's Blog and Julian Real Smear Campaign (YouTube)

2008-11-21T02:42:00.000-08:00

(YouTube) Antifeminism - And What It Means To Me

2008-11-21T02:40:00.000-08:00

It's True! White Heterosexual Men are Evil!

2008-11-20T21:40:00.000-08:00

On behalf of all white, heterosexual man. I just want to make a statement: it's true. We are evil. All we think about, in every waking moment of our lives, is how to further oppress people with our misogynistic, homophobic, and racist ways. Minorities sicken us, that's why we only pretend to tolerate them when working alongside them, going to their house when we're invited for Christmas, or when we get into interracial relationships. That's how sneaky we are.

"When will white heterosexual men's gross human rights atrocities end? - Julian Real"

NEVERRRRR! Here, I'll make a deal. Us white guys will stop trampelling on human rights, when all the other races stop too. It's only fair. It's not like white people own the monopoly on dispensing atrocity. Mankind in general has a rich history of inhumanity. Look at what's going on in Uganda and Darfur. Not everything is the fault of the white man.

The Europeans did invade Native American soil and drove the Natives off their own land, and forced them to live on reserves. Native Americans, though, aren't completely innocent. They were warring amongst each other, fighting each other's tribes, long before the White Man showed up. Two wrong don't make a right. I believe the Japanese and Chinese also have a rich history of creating suffering amongst people. Check out a movie called "Men Behind The Sun" for a look at the atrocities commited by the Japanese on the Chinese people, during World War II. Chinese were used as "maruta," disposable fodder for their endless cruel experiments that seemed to serve no real scientific purpose.

And of course, everything bad is commited by men, right? WRONG! Women also have a rich history of commiting atrocities. Just look at Elizabeth Bathory, she killed many peasents and it was believed that she used their blood to slow the aging process, and keep her beauty as she crept into old age. It has been written that she was responsible for the deaths of 650 women.

Society downlplays voilence perpetrated by women, and want to have us believe that they control the monopoly of victimhood. Not true:

Battered Men? Battered Facts

Husbands are battered as much as wives in the U.S.? John Leo, syndicated U.S. News & World Report columnist, is sure of it.

"There's no doubt about this," Leo said as a guest on CNN's Crossfire (7/2/94). "It was established in 1980 by a female researcher."

When co-host Michael Kinsley asked him if it seemed plausible that women were as violent as men, Leo dismissed the question. "We don't have to cogitate this," he said. "The evidence is in. All these studies have established this."

Leo is not alone in insisting on parity between battered men and battered women. Domestic violence "is not either the man's fault or the woman's," Judith Sherven and James Sniechowski wrote in an L.A. Times op-ed (6/21/94). "Both the male and the female are bound in their dance of mutual destructiveness."

"Why do we protest domestic violence against women and not even know about violence against men?" men's advocate Warren Farrell wrote in a USA Today column (6/29/94), arguing that women's violence is as bad as men's-- if not worse.

Alan Dershowitz, part of O.J. Simpson's defense team, used his syndicated column (L.A. Times, 7/21/94) to argue that spousal murder is "primarily a psychological issue of pervasive familial violence on all sides, generated by the passions of family interaction."

All these claims and suggestions about "battered men" being as pervasive and serious a problem as battered women are based on studies that are either discredited or taken out of context.

One of Leo's major sources (U.S. News, 7/11/94) is Richard Gelles, who with Murray Strauss did surveys on family violence. Leo may like Gelles' work, but Gelles doesn't like Leo's: "He takes enough factual statements and twists them so he gets it to come out the way he wants," Gelles told EXTRA!Update.

The Gelles/Strauss numbers that Leo and others seize on are based on simply asking people whether they have ever hit, pushed, slapped, etc. their partners. They do not reflect the context of family violence. They do not indicate whether violence was used as aggression or in self-defense, or whether violence caused or was intended to cause injury. Using such numbers without qualification results in bizarre conclusions: that children's violence against parents is a much more serious problem than parents' violence against children, for example.

Gelles put his research in perspective in a Long Island Newsday op-ed (2/22/94): "In the majority of these cases, the women act in response to physical or psychological provocations or threats. Most use violence as a defensive reaction to violence."

Those who equate domestic violence against men with that against women either ignore or dismiss the results of the federal Bureau of Justice Statistics, which found that 92 percent of those who report being assaulted by an intimate partner are female. They also brush off reports from emergency rooms, where 90 percent of the victims of domestic violence are women.

But statistics are not the strong point of these battered men advocates. Dershowitz claims that a Bureau of Justice Statistics study shows that "women kill almost as often as men do in the context of family murders." The study actually found that men committed 66 percent of family murders, so apparently for Dershowitz "almost as often" means the same thing as "about half as often."

Sherven and Sniechowski, in their op-ed, claim that "half of spousal murders are committed by wives, a statistic that has been stable over time." In fact, according to 1991 figures from the FBI, which has the most comprehensive murder statistics, 71 percent of people murdered by their spouses are women.

While it is true that some men are battered, research that looks at violence in a meaningful way shows that they are a tiny fraction of the number of battered women--perhaps 5 percent. (See Mildred Daley Pagelow, L.A. Times op-ed, 7/3/94.) These men are not helped by pundits who use overhyped, out-of-context numbers to argue that battering is no one's fault in particular-- with the implication that nothing in particular needs to be done about it.

I Like To Fuck With People's Heads

2008-11-20T21:22:00.001-08:00

Shangi, here! I'd just like to make another post for the hell of it. Readers of this blog will come to know, that I like to fuck with people's heads. There's a lot of sarcasm in my writings, and I think spelling out when I'm joking, and when I'm not, is rather boring. I'll let you guys figure it out for yourself.

I'd like to consider myself somewhat of an amateur anthropologist, testing the waters, seeing how people react to different things. It shows what people really are deep inside. I'd like to think of each and every being on this planet as part of my social experimentation, much like The Joker experiments with the people of Gotham City.

I seem to bring out the best of people. If I say something you don't like, you'll track me down and publish my e-mail address for all to see. Sometimes, I'm not kidding around though, and that's where confusion sets in. I like to confuse people. It keeps people on their toes, keeps them guessing, and that way... I'll never be boring.

The attacks on me by people like Juilan Real of The Radical Feminist blog, is exactly what I want out of this blog. Every time he tries to go out of his way to hurt me, it reveals just how hypocritical people like him are. And that's what I'm all about, exposing the ridiculous. Careful what actions you might choose to take, you never know when you might be playing right into my hands.

Take care, sickos. Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!

Julian Real Gives The People What They Want... More Shangi!

2008-11-20T20:56:00.000-08:00

Julian Real just can't get me out of his head. That's why I'm the subject of once again, another one of his blogs. To say that he isn't obsessed with me, only to have every waking thought he has to be of me, is very telling how much in denial he is. You can check out Julian's latest rant about me HERE.

To view his YouTube video, in which he speaks about himself and his opinion that he doesn't hate women, see this. A significantly less serious warning: this video is rambling and boring.

Much like your blogs? Eh, Julian? That's why you need to give the people more of they want. And that's more of me. I'm way more interesting than you, so you just give up writing your own words, and give your readers something more interesting to read. You might as well copy everything from my blogs, and keep posting my videos - 'cause they have an entertainment value of "9," while everything you do has an entertainment value of "2." You get two points for at least giving me something to riff on every time your dumb ass sits down in front of your computer.

"Fuck The Feminists" sure did as it intended to do... and that was to piss people like you off. Publish my e-mail address all you want, it only proves how obsessed with me you are.

He reportedly is from Calgary, Alberta, Canada. He is listed as 24 years old, and is white with short to medium-length brown hair. Women should regard him as a dangerous individual.

Oh, and Patrick Doran, re: your allegations of me stalking and being, um, attracted to you:

You're not my type. My type is humane, thoughtful, caring, profeminist (anti-racist, anti-misogynist, anti-homophobic) men who don't behave like the stupid, hateful asshole you repeatedly portray yourself to be.

Well, Julian. Everybody knows that women love bad boys. So ladies, thanks to Julian... you all know my e-mail address. If you're interested in hooking up with this "dangerous individual." Holla. ;)

Revealing how misogynistic, antifeminist, antiWomanist men behave is part of my political work, and reporting men who threaten to kill women is important for anyone to do. Therefore, I'm placing your threatening statement here, with your contact information, where it might be seen by someone living in your part of Canada who can report and/or arrest you.

(That's not an invitation to go out on a date, in case you are still confused.)

Your motives are very clear to me, Julian. You're a sick individual, with no sense of humor, an emotional axe to grind against men, with borderline stalkerish tendencies. If you really weren't obsessed with me, you wouldn't have spent so much time on me, like I knew you were going to do. You've opened a can of worms here, Julian. Going after me was the dumbest mistake you can ever make. I don't care what you say about me, 'cause every time you do, I have something to write about in my blog. That's part of MY political work.

So give the people what they really want. And that's more Shangi.

"Love" Is A Word In A Pop Song

2008-11-17T21:49:00.000-08:00

My father tells me that I'm too young to be a bitter old man. I just happen to think that society is so fucked up, that it is making me age faster. I feel tired all the time, devoid of the dopey-grinned optimism that I see in a lot of young fellers in my age group.

Where am I going with this? Oh yeah, "Love" is a word in a pop song! I saw that sentence used in a post on a message board, and that sentence alone just stuck in my mind. "Love is a word in a pop song." No truer words have been spoken in my mind. All my life, I have been assaulted with overly-sentimental views of love and "relationships" through media, people, and Hallmark cards - and all I have to say is that you're all a bunch of fuckwits.

Because "love" is a word in a pop song. I'm writing this blog for the 19-year-old dipshit that just loves the song "Lips of An Angel" by the band Hinder. You lie in your bed alone, fingering your pussy, as you listen to the lead singer mumble on about how he wishes the girl on the telephone was his girlfriend instead of the "one in the next room." Oh, he's so sensitive! So romantic. Bitch, please! You're so fucking stupid. How long until YOU'RE the girl in the next room. And then you wonder what happened to all the nice guys? They met you're dumb fucking ass, bitch.

Oh, I'm sorry. I'm overly bitter. It's amazing how overly cranky I've gotten in only twenty-four years on planet Earth. But, maybe I have a right to be. Check out this article, 'Love in the Time of Darwinism'

This is an article by Kay S. Hymowitz, who also wrote an article called 'Child-Man in the Promised Land.' In that article, she claimed that the current generation of men are foregoing the traditional expectations of adulthood such as marriage, because of immaturity. She couldn't have been more further from the truth, so she sought to rectify herself with this article, and I agree, she's now a little closer to hitting the nail on the head.

It would be easy enough to hold up some of the callow ranting that the piece inspired as proof positive of the child-man’s existence. But the truth is that my correspondents’ objections gave me pause. Their argument, in effect, was that the SYM is putting off traditional markers of adulthood—one wife, two kids, three bathrooms—not because he’s immature but because he’s angry. He’s angry because he thinks that young women are dishonest, self-involved, slutty, manipulative, shallow, controlling, and gold-digging. He’s angry because he thinks that the culture disses all things male. He’s angry because he thinks that marriage these days is a raw deal for men.

Here’s Jeff from Middleburg, Florida: “I am not going to hitch my wagon to a woman . . . who is more into her abs, thighs, triceps, and plastic surgery. A woman who seems to have forgotten that she did graduate high school and that it’s time to act accordingly.” Jeff, meet another of my respondents, Alex: “Maybe we turn to video games not because we are trying to run away from the responsibilities of a ‘grown-up life’ but because they are a better companion than some disease-ridden bar tramp who is only after money and a free ride.” Care for one more? This is from Dean in California: “Men are finally waking up to the ever-present fact that traditional marriage, or a committed relationship, with its accompanying socially imposed requirements of being wallets with legs for women, is an empty and meaningless drudgery.” You can find the same themes posted throughout websites like AmericanWomenSuck, NoMarriage, MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way), and Eternal Bachelor (“Give modern women the husband they deserve. None”).

That's right! Fuck marriage! That's something I've thought long and hard about since I was twelve, watching the pain and misery of divorce eat away at my father's very soul, and my own pain... watching my family disintegrate - being estranged from my younger brother, because my mother decided it was best to seperate us - me being raised by my father, while he being raised by mother. I think I got the better of the deal, being raised by a man... my brother has had to live with and put up with whomever mother has brought home from AA. Since my parents seperation and eventual divorce, there have been three live-in boyfriends.

The first boyfriend, an out-of-work stage actor named "Dave" who she still swears to this day as being "just friends," with even though he was sleeping in the same bed with her every night, since my parents were seperated. I was nine-years-old then and this was before my mother sent me away to live with Dad. I wasn't stupid then, either. I knew what was going on. And I didn't like it. Not. One. Bit. And since I was older, and caused the most problems for my mother. I had to be disposed of, sent to live with my father who was living in an other province at the time. One night, (before I had been sent away) Dave, in a fit of anger, threw my brother across the room. I went to my mother about it, only to get a "well maybe he made him mad," as a response.

As soon as I was sent to live with Dad, I told him about Dave had done to his younger son. One phone call from Dad, and Dave was never seen or heard from since. He must've ran off like the scared little bitch that he was. A year later, my father and I moved back to BC to be closer to my brother. Expecting to see Dave still living there, we instead discovered that my mother had been living with a new man. This time his name was "Doug." Now "Doug" was an even bigger asshole than Dave. He had severe emotional problems, which included a violent temper, and I long suspected him to be abusing my brother (which he was).

One day, I went to visit my brother, who had been grounded by this man, kept prisoner in his own room, for merely getting a drink of water, because his presence annoyed this man. I decided that I could no longer stand this man. I was fifteen-years-old now, and I decided that if this guy was going to hit my brother, I was going to be around to witness it and then I would nail him. I convinced my brother to provoke Doug into doing something and it worked. It worked more than I thought it would. The man went off into a violent rage, shoving my brother through a closet door, and nearly knocking the folding door off its hinges. I was scared. My plan was to attack this man as soon as I witnessed an assault, for it would be self-defence, but now that I had seen what this man was capable of, I was scared. As my brother got up, he shoves him through the door again, before tossing him into his room. It took me awhile to gather up my nerve, before I came out of the room with the belt.

After confronting him, we got into a fight. He took the belt from me, and he used it on me. Then, he threw me into my brother's room, and told me that if I ever stepped out of that room he would break my arms. He was calling us "cocksucker" and yelled with such violence his false teeth detached from his gums and he nearly choked from it. After awhile, he came back, quieter, he must have been thinking about what he had done because that's when he sent me home. That was his mistake, because as soon as I got home, I called the cops on him. He was charged, and a restraining order placed on him. My mother was still seeing him, though for a little while after that. But then after awhile, he wasn't seen or heard from for over a week. Then, his body was discovered in his apartment. He had killed himself by downing some pills. I felt no pity for him.

Boyfriend number three appeared not long after Doug was cremated. Maybe a week. So much for mourning. My brother and I knew another one was coming, because our mother decided to start going to AA again. See, that's what she did back then. She went to AA as a dating service, and when she found the next loser, she would stop going. It was all part of her twisted game she played with people. She would always absolve herself of any responsibility and play the victim all the time. This new man was different. Whereas, her last boyfriend was on her way to prison, this guy just got out. Way to go, Mom. Actually, in the end he turned out to be better than the last two. I never got along with him in the beginning, why would I? Now I have him as a friend on my Facebook. Funny, how life is.

In the beginning I saw him as a bit of a man-child. He wasn't as bright as most people his age, at sixteen-going-on-seventeen, I felt I was intellectually superior to him (which I am).

But what is the point I'm trying to make? The point is... after experiencing all this why would I want to jump on the same marriage bandwagon? Why should I have children? As a man, I would have no say in what would happen with any future children that I might have. My father was powerless, unable to do anything about the kind of men that my brother was exposed to whenever my mother brought a man home. Why should I get married with "no fault" divorced? Why should I get married, when I'm most likely going to pay alimony? Why should I get married when everything I have ever worked hard and earned, could be taken away, just because my "wife" no longer loved me any more? Am I being so unreasonable?

By the time men reach their twenties, they have years of experience with women as equal competitors in school, on soccer fields, and even in bed. Small wonder if they initially assume that the women they meet are after the same things they are: financial independence, career success, toned triceps, and sex.

But then, when an SYM walks into a bar and sees an attractive woman, it turns out to be nothing like that. The woman may be hoping for a hookup, but she may also be looking for a husband, a co-parent, a sperm donor, a relationship, a threesome, or a temporary place to live. She may want one thing in November and another by Christmas. “I’ve gone through phases in my life where I bounce between serial monogamy, Very Serious Relationships and extremely casual sex,” writes Megan Carpentier on Jezebel, a popular website for young women. “I’ve slept next to guys on the first date, had sex on the first date, allowed no more than a cheek kiss, dispensed with the date-concept altogether after kissing the guy on the way to his car, fucked a couple of close friends and, more rarely, slept with a guy I didn’t care if I ever saw again.” Okay, wonders the ordinary guy with only middling psychic powers, which is it tonight?

Indeed, which is it tonight?

RESPONSE TO "LOVE IN THE TIME OF DARWINISM" ARTICLE

by PERCY

Eloquent.

She writes very well, with sound 'evidence' from her everyday sources. But she confines herself to young men; chaps who still have the cradle marks on their bums even if they have read and understood the writing on the wall.

She, no doubt, elsewhere in her book, will deal with the older chap. I hope so. He is less cocky but his anger is considerably more well founded. He has dropped all pretension or intention to procreate. He wants nothing to do with women.

Make Love to them? With them? Women only know Love as a word in a pop song. Shag them? Not even that. No chance. They are simply not worthy of his efforts.

He is heart-sick. His mode is sadness. Not that he wears it on his sleeve. He goes about his business cut off from his socety. Society, to him WAS women. It was children. It was family. But women have right royally fucked it up.

Many such men had a family and had children. He loved both. He had his woman by his side, and he loved her. But she turned to face in a different direction. She broke the family apart in a fit of violence which devasted his psychic landscape like a nuclear explosion. Everything he had was taken in an instant.

Why build a new house?; why lay a new road; why plant a garden; why provide and protect. It can be destroyed in an instant. By her. It happened.

Women who deserve his mature attention, his warmth and self-sacrifice, are far too busy whining while looking in the mirror. They don't care.

He no longer cares, either.

If Darwinianism has rules, then this is the end game.

Cute Kid Sings "Hey Jude!"

2008-11-17T19:21:00.000-08:00

Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! This is so awesome!

Julian Real Doesn't Know Shit From Chocolate Pudding

2008-11-17T15:22:00.000-08:00

Here is an article from The Sydney Morning Herald dated May 31st, 2006:

Dutch pedophiles are launching a political party to push for a cut in the legal age for sexual relations to 12 from 16 and the legalisation of child pornography and sex with animals, sparking widespread outrage.

The Charity, Freedom and Diversity (NVD) party said on its web site it would be officially registered today, proclaiming: "We are going to shake The Hague awake!"

The party said it wanted to cut the legal age for sexual relations to 12 and eventually scrap the limit altogether.

"A ban just makes children curious," Ad van den Berg, one of the party's founders, told the Algemeen Dagblad newspaper.

"We want to make pedophilia the subject of discussion," he said, adding the subject had been a taboo since the 1996 Marc Dutroux child abuse scandal in neighbouring Belgium.

"We want to get into parliament so we have a voice. Other politicians only talk about us in a negative sense, as if we were criminals," Van den Berg told Reuters.

The Netherlands, which already has liberal policies on soft drugs, prostitution and gay marriage, was shocked by the plan.

An opinion poll published today showed that 82 per cent wanted the government to do something to stop the new party, while 67 per cent said promoting pedophilia should be illegal.

"They make out as if they want more rights for children. But their position that children should be allowed sexual contact from age 12 is of course just in their own interest," anti-pedophile campaigner Ireen van Engelen told the AD daily.

Right-wing lawmaker Geert Wilders said he had asked the government to investigate whether a party with such "sick ideas" could really be established, ANP news agency reported.

Kees van deer Staaij, a member of the Christian SGP party, also demanded action: "Pedophilia and child pornography should be taboo in every constitutional state. Breaking that will just create more victims and more serious ones."

The party wants private possession of child pornography to be allowed although it supports the ban on the trade of such materials. It also supports allowing pornography to be broadcast on daytime television, with only violent pornography limited to the late evening.

Toddlers should be given sex education and youths aged 16 and up should be allowed to appear in pornographic films and prostitute themselves. Sex with animals should be allowed although abuse of animals should remain illegal, the NVD said.

The party also said everybody should be allowed to go naked in public and promotes legalising all soft and hard drugs and free train travel for all.

This very same article was copied and pasted on Julian Real's A Radical Profeminist blog. under the new headline: "Dutch Men's Rights Group wanted to rape children without consequence to the men."

Now this was an obvious attempt by Julian to confuse his readers into thinking the Pedophile Party was an actual Men's Rights group. A petty smear campaign tactic if you ask me. Real Mens' Rights groups have nothing to do with the rights of pedophiles. This comes as no surprise to me, that Julian Real would pull a stunt like this because, this is after all, the same guy who stalked me after I left a comment on another one of his idiotic blogs -- finding a MySpace page of mine and copying and pasting that in an effort to shame me. It didn't work, it only made him look like a bigger loser. Check out my previous blog: 'I'm Being Stalked By A Radical Profeminist.'

Men’s rights are the freedoms inherently possessed by men and boys of all ages, which may be institutionalized, ignored or suppressed by law, custom, and behavior in a particular society. The term may also refer to an activist movement advancing these rights. Supporters of men's rights aim to promote the physical, economic and emotional well-being of all men and boys, viewing this as part of human rights, civil rights, or equal rights. They are particularly concerned with issues involving family life such as family law, child custody, paternity fraud, and domestic violence. There is no single unifying manifesto or organization which can claim to speak for the entire movement and the term is used in various ways.

Related areas of the men's movement include:

Fathers' rights focus on the relationship between fathers and their children and in particular family law.

Masculism provides a counterpart to feminism and argues against legal constructs, reforms, or entitlements which deny men equal rights under the law on the basis of gender; there are conservative "traditionalist", "liberal", and libertarian strands.

Someone like Julian Real, who undoubtably suffers from a form of chemical imbalance, can't make a distinction between groups such as

a.) NAMBLA - North American Man/Boy Love Association: a New York City and San Francisco-based unincorporated organization in the United States that advocates the liberalisation of laws against sexual relations between adult and minor males - resolving to "end the oppression of men and boys who have freely chosen mutually consenting relationships".

or

b.) Fathers 4 Justice: a movement whose members are primarily interested in issues related to family law, including child custody and child support that affect fathers and their children.

To put the two groups in the same leauge as each other is frankly quite insulting, further proof that Julian Real doesn't know shit from chocolate pudding.

YouTube - MenareSHIT01's Channel

2008-11-17T12:49:00.000-08:00

MenareSHIT01

Joined: October 25, 2008
Last Sign In: 13 hours ago
Videos Watched: 271
Subscribers: 2
Channel Views: 341A REAL feminist.
I support castration of sex offenders.
"Look him in the eyes when you kick him in the balls." -MENareSHIT

-Pro Castration of first time sex-offenders.
-Supports death penalty for rape.
-Pro-Circumcision.
Name: Jessica

Country: United States
Interests and Hobbies: tae kwon do
Movies and Shows: Lifetime,*Saw movies;the men being punished
Books: anything shotacon
Website: http://nutabuse.com

A friend of mine sent me this link to a YouTube profile that I found very interesting indeed. She describes herself as a REAL feminist, and displays an erotic fixation with castration. I checked out the NutAbuse.com link where I was greeted by a video of a man being tortured by two females, in a display of intense BDSM. One woman has his balls hooked up by a tether, as she yanks on it, while another woman kicks him in the balls. It was kind of hot.

MenareSHIT01's channel is comprised of various YouTube videos that she has selected as "Favorites," which include: How To Treat A Pedophile - a video of a man (presumably a pedophile - the video is not in English, it's hard to tell) being beaten mercilessly by an angry mob, Saw 3 - Timothy Death Rack, Hostel 2 - The Cutting Scene, Saw 5 - The Pendulum Trap, RoboCop: The Death of Alex Murphy Uncut, Man Cuts Off Penis - which by the way... unlike the other videos has no real violence. It's merely a comedic sketch where a man tells the other that he has an STD... and the other man responds by cutting off his own penis (obviously staged and not shown), Pig Castration Video part 2, Pig Castration, and of course Project X - The Castration Experiment.

Here is a comment that she left on her own page:

"All young men and boys(Especially ManicRevelation) are violent and perverted just like fuckin animals are and in fact even worse than animals! animals are atleast neutered, but you men should'nt have penises we women shall cut them off slowly and painfully until we finish it! Having balls is completely unnatural. You stupid men cannot function in society nor respect women like me in anyway. therefore we should torture every man and boy! once we do that, we will feed their genitals to the dogs! And then we will cut the dogs' penises off. Once we do that, we will feed it to the man!!! And then we will chop HIS FUCKEN HEAD OFFFFFFF!!!!!!1!!!!!!!1!!111!!!!!!111"

She mentioned a YouTube user named, ManicRevelation. Here is what he had to say:

"You have some of the most disgusting shit I have ever seen on this page, and for what reason? How did this make anything any better? You can't stereotype people and dump your hate all over them because you have personal fucking problems. Seriously, some of the sickest shit I have ever seen, and you've attracted my hatred toward your kind enough to watch you, and I will not simply go away. If you actually want to debate me in a civilized, dignified manner and offer your twisted views some support, please feel free to do so."

Here is an interesting comment from a user called "jadedrevelations" (Relation???!):

"Wow .. way to play into it, people. This is all a joke. It's done for shock value and to get attention. I mean, come on, to say men are disgusting and violent and then condone violence and have nothing but violence and gore vidoes posted should be enough to tell you of her obvious hipocrisy. It's not funny to most, but some share her humor. Just don't play into it. She'll be mutilating kittens in no time and move away from YouTube. "

This young lady, who has the appearance of the typical layabout found at VampireFreaks.com, seems to have something called "penis envy." Penis envy in Freudian psychoanalysis refers to the theorized reaction of a girl during her psychosexual development to the realization that she does not have a penis. Freud considered this realization a defining moment in the development of gender and sexual identity for women. According to Freud, the parallel reaction in boys to the realization that girls do not have a penis is castration anxiety.

In contemporary culture, the term is sometimes used inexactly or metaphorically to refer to the idea that women wish they had a penis, or to refer to anxieties between men about the size of their genitals.

There is a post on a men's forum called "Antimisandry.com" from a user named 'Carnival of Reaction,' that I find relevant to this subject. This is what he had to say:

Feminism is obsessed with castration. It jokes about castrating men all the time (and you know what Freud said about sexual jokes). It also tries to turn castration into public policy by saying it is a good idea to castrate rapists (and then declaring that all men are rapists.)

Feminism encourages women to carry out their own freelance castrations by idolising women who castrate their partners. It also encourages genital mutilation of little boys- and what is circumcision but a timid castration? Even in the field of architecture they obsess about the penis like qualities of tall buildings and advocate tearing them down.

Castration is carried into the mental realm as well- the constant belittling of men is a form of mental castration, and the feminists are well aware of it. This is why feminists seek to destroy the pride of men by alleging impotence or a small penis- the feminists are unable to castrate the man physically so they do so mentally.

They will even sacrifice the physical safety of women in order to indulge their sick fantasies- women’s self defence consists of lessons in damaging men’s genitals to the exclusion of all else.

Where does this great glee in castration come from? Why should a woman devote much of her adult life to discussing it? How is it that an entire political philosophy obsesses upon this one thing?

The answer is sex- and power.

In primates the dominant male will often signal his dominance by an erection. This fills feminists with an obsessive fear of penises and a desire to destroy them- because they can never grow one themselves. This fear takes a number of forms- one of which is the baseless belief that men everywhere want to rape them.

Another motor of this perversion is that castration is rather like a particularly explosive orgasm. During ejaculation a woman may become aware of the hot semen spurting from her partners body- yet this can never compare with the thrill of castrating an erect penis. Blood is hotter than semen and gushes out by the pint. Blood will spray the walls and the ceiling, it will soak the mattress and form lakes on the floor.

Sexual killers will often take trophies from their victims that the killer believes will bring power to the holder. What better trophy could there be than the penis of a dead castrated man? If the killer is bisexual then the dried penis can even play another role- as a sort of strap on dildo. The feminist may also fantasise about cutting the dead penis into small pieces and eating a little each day- for strength.

These fantasies are very common among women- but decency keeps them in check most of the time.

"Fuck The Feminists"

2008-11-17T01:37:00.000-08:00

Fuck the Feminists, 'cause they've gone too far
MadShangi's gonna expose what cunts they are
I'm no fake, and I'm no player
MadShangi is the motherfucking truth sayer
You say you want equality, you're lyin'
You're just a greedy bitch that wants what's mine
You stupid bitch, don't be a sequel
To the last bitch that thought she was equal
You're a stupid ass motherfucking bitch ass ho
MadShangi says: “Fuck your soul!”
Don't cry about a wage gap, it's a load of crap
MadShangi's got the facts, so shut your trap
You dumb little bitches are crying and shit
You dumb little bitches are going to have a fit
You got your numbers right, but you read them wrong
That's why I'm a correct you with this song
'cause women don't earn less because of sexism
MadShangi's gonna put some sense in 'em
Women earn less 'cause of the choices they make
like all the time off that they take
Most women won't choose back-breaking labor
And those kinds of jobs are the ones that pay more
Women take a year off when they get knocked up
They can take as many years for every kid they cough up
They cut out early, they take more vacations
MadShangi won't give a bitch half his life savings
By marrying a bitch that's in it for the money
'Cause MadShangi ain't no motherfucking dummy
Yo marriage is a business, the woman's getting paid
You might as well pay a whore, just to get laid
Divorces are high, and they're only getting higher
You might as well stick your dick in the fryer
'Cause the next bitch could be just like Heather Mills
Sad bitches like her drown their sorrows with pills
Missing a fucking leg is nothing compared
To what she did to Paul McCartney, be scared
So MadShangi is going to educate you dumb motherfuckers
MadShangi says: Marriage Is For Suckers
Y'all gang up and put men to silence
And tell us that we commit 90% of violence
Your numbers are wrong, the stats are even
It's kind of funny what a bitch will believe in
If you hit me, I'll fucking hit you back
MadShangi would knock your bitch-ass flat
I'll fuck you up, I'll stomp on your head
MadShangi would kill a bitch dead
Gonna spill more blood than your average thriller
'Cause MadShangi is the Feminist Killer

Fuck the Feminists, 'cause they're so full of shit
MadShangi is sick of it
This propaganda is making me weary
MadShangi's gonna make you see clearly
Lorena Bobbit should be in jail, instead she got off
for taking a knife and hacking her husband's cock off
That's fucking assault, it's attempted murder
instead you believe her bullshit about how he hurt her
'case he somehow “abused” her, it makes it okay
'Cause bitches aren't responsible for what they do or say
'Cause you're the kind of bitch that gets behind Mary Winkler
who shot her husband dead, watched him bleed like a sprinkler
She took a shotgun, shot her preacher husband in the back
and told us all that it was a self-defense act
and she gets invited on Oprah, to tell her sad tale
After only spending three years in jail
She holds up a white shoe and hangs her head in mock shame
The shoe he “made her wear,” how fucking lame
If it was self-defense, then explain if you can
what's so threatening about a sleeping man?
When Andrea Yates drowned her babies they expressed:
The notion that she's the victim, 'cause she was “depressed”
Fucking bullshit, I'm sick of the excuse
For women who kill, because they suffered abuse
And the bitches get off 'cause we're all soft for a woman
When the bitch we're soft for is cold and wooden
I ain't like no other bitch motherfucker
MadShangi's not soft on a murderous mother
I'd rather see bitches like that suffer
Word to the motherfucker

Fuck the feminists, 'cause they're ball-breaking bitches
MadShangi's gonna burn all them witches
you would get behind the bitch that shot Andy Warhol
'cause the crazy ass bitch is your role model
Don't cry like a bitch, 'cause I don't empathize
MadShangi 's gonna cut a bitch down to size
When a bitch buys into this, it makes me laugh
Bitch go back to practicing witchcraft
Gonna go online and find your address
'Cause MadShangi's gonna kill a misandrist
Fuck you Germaine Greer, you pedophile granny
MadShangi's gonna expose you as a tranny
'The Beautiful Boy' was a great work of smut
Someone hide the kids from this horny old slut
The boy on your cover grew up, doesn't like it one bit
Being used as a poster child for your weak shit
You put it on there without his permission
on the cover to further your mission
You hate adult men and you love little boys
MadShangi says “Fuck your noise”
You're a professor, but you got no class
'Cause you reinvented yourself as a middle-aged pederast
Fuck you Oprah, you think you're the black queen
MadShangi says: “You're really the black fiend!”
Fuck your book club and fuck “O Magazine”
Burn it all down with a match and gasoline
I hate your show and everything you stand for
'Cause your nothing but a spoiled old rich whore
Fuck you, 'cause you're your own religion
'Cause your sanity is down to a smidgen
Your followers are half-wit, bandwagon-jumping trend slaves
The Church of Oprah of making waves
She acts as if her damn show has “evolved”
Another puzzle that MadShangi has solved
'Cause her show is still the same crap it was before
Salacious sex and deviance stories galore
With a shrink in the audience to make it all seem highbrow
You put this bitch's morals on a pedestal now
So fuck Oprah and fuck Dr. Phil
The two of them could chew on cyanide pills
'Cause women live in a world, that just isn't real
That's why my mom wrote to Miss Cleo
She believed her when, she said she was psychic
By the way, did you know I'm really Batman's sidekick?

Fuck the Feminists, 'cause they rule our schools
MadShangi's gonna expose these fools
They taking young gentlemen and feed them Ritalin
When it's nothing but crack cocaine for little children
schools get additional money for every child drugged
Ritalin may kill someone you love
ADD is an excuse, 'cause the system is lazy
That's why today's kids are growing up crazy
Shoot their fucking schools up, school violence
MadShangi is breaking the silence
The majority of teachers are clearly women
And they're puppets for Feminism
They fill bullshit into minds of the impressionable
What they teach is downright questionable
Boys are falling behind, while girls are getting ahead
'Cause the schools and feminism are in bed
They have the nerve to blame men for all date rape
On a so-called educational videotape
They never mention female-on-male cases
'Cause when you learn from a bitch, history erases
They'll preach female superiority, with impudence
and female teachers gets off after fucking their students
I wrote this song for all you fathers
That are estranged from your sons and daughters
I'm pissed off, so I'm sending right this off
To the bitches and that deserved to be kissed off
And some of you dumb fucks may try to stop me
'Cause your tools of the Illuminati
The war is on and it's either them or us
MadShangi says: “Fuck the Feminists”

MadShangi Responds To Childish "Real Men" Lists

2008-11-16T23:36:00.000-08:00

I just got this e-mail from a girl, who basically just copied one of these lists that I find on a lot of women's MySpace and BangMe profiles.

1.)A REAL MAN respects his mother and places his Woman first.

2.) A REAL MAN raises his kids, not JUST out of pocket either.

3.) A REAL MAN supports his woman to develop herself.

4.) A REAL MAN doesn't worry about what others depict as a real man. Walk in his shoes first and then tell him what makes him A REAL MAN.

5.) A REAL MAN doesn't Break Promises

6.) A REAL MAN calls you BEAUTIFUL, not hot, sexy, or fine as fuck.

8.) A REAL MAN CALLS U on a daily basis - NO MATTER HOW BUSY OR TIRED HE IS.

9.) A REAL MAN looks past what he's heard about you OR WHAT HIS FRIENDS THINK OF YOU!

10.) A REAL MAN wants to spend as much time as he can with you & won't get sick of you.

11.) A REAL MAN comes over JUST to watch movies with you.

12.) A REAL MAN kisses you on the forehead just because.

13.) A REAL MAN doesn't tell you what he thinks you want to hear. He tells you what's real.

14.) A REAL MAN should be treated like one.

15.) A REAL MAN doesn't ask questions when you say you need something... him, sex, or money, a bed to sleep in.

16.) A REAL MAN lets others know How He Feels About his Girl.

17.) A REAL MAN doesn't play games!!!!!!!!!!!

18.) A REAL MAN doesn't leave his girl to go and hang out with his friends if he hasn't seen her in a week and then call her at 4 in the morning because he needs some loving.

19.) A REAL MAN doesn't deny you.

20.) A REAL MAN doesn't just think about sex.

21.) A REAL MAN Doesn't Judge a book by the cover.

22.) A REAL MAN wouldn't use his friendship card to get what he wants.

23.) A REAL MAN knows the difference between a REAL WOMAN and a random girl.

24.)A REAL MAN won't degrade a woman with words nor will he ever put his hand on her in anger.

25.) A REAL MAN sends you flowers Just Because.

Okay, here's some things that I would like to point out.

Quote:

3.) A REAL MAN supports his woman to develop herself.

Get REAL!

Quote:

15.) A REAL MAN doesn't ask questions when you say you need something... him, sex, or money, a bed to sleep in.

Get REAL!

Quote:

10.) A REAL MAN wants to spend as much time as he can with you & won't get sick of you.

Yeah, and pigs fly and dogs shit roses.

Quote:

19.) A REAL MAN doesn't deny you.

Bitch, I said "no!"

Quote:

8.) A REAL MAN CALLS U on a daily basis - NO MATTER HOW BUSY OR TIRED HE IS.

Keep dreaming.

Quote:

4.) A REAL MAN doesn't worry about what others depict as a real man. Walk in his shoes first and then tell him what makes him A REAL MAN.

How ironic.

RESPONSES THAT I LIKED:

KIM

Re: "Real Men" Lists

permalink

Quote:

4.) A REAL MAN doesn't worry about what others depict as a real man. Walk in his shoes first and then tell him what makes him A REAL MAN. How ironic.

Yes, I too noticed the humor in such a statement sitting amongst a laundry list of requirements in order to bear the title of 'a real man'.

DYSLEXIC BANANA

Re: "Real Men" Lists

permalink

1.)A REAL MAN respects his mother and places his Woman first.

And what about his father?

2.) A REAL MAN raises his kids, not JUST out of pocket either.

That is, of course, if he is actually ALLOWED to do so.......

3.) A REAL MAN supports his woman to develop herself.

So much for the "strong, independent woman", huh?

4.) A REAL MAN doesn't worry about what others depict as a real man. Walk in his shoes first and then tell him what makes him A REAL MAN.

Okay, this list HAS to be a piss-take...........doesn't it...................?

6.) A REAL MAN calls you BEAUTIFUL, not hot, sexy, or fine as fuck.

Regardless of whether or not you actually are?

8.) A REAL MAN CALLS U on a daily basis - NO MATTER HOW BUSY OR TIRED HE IS.

But does his girlfriend ever call HIM??? Or is making calls yet another expense that the pussy pass excuses women from having to make?

9.) A REAL MAN looks past what he's heard about you OR WHAT HIS FRIENDS THINK OF YOU!

Because, of course, whatever is said about her, it could NEVER be true, right? Why do I get the feeling that this one only applies, if what is said is NEGATIVE???

13.) A REAL MAN doesn't tell you what he thinks you want to hear. He tells you what's real.

I sense a conflict with # 6.

14.) A REAL MAN should be treated like one.

Wow, you mean men are ACTUALLY entitled to some sort of treatment, every now and again? You misogynist, you!

15.) A REAL MAN doesn't ask questions when you say you need something... him, sex, or money, a bed to sleep in.

WHORE.

16.) A REAL MAN lets others know How He Feels About his Girl.

So long as it's all good, RIGHT?

17.) A REAL MAN doesn't play games!!!!!!!!!!!

No, we tend to leave that to women, you're right....

19.) A REAL MAN doesn't deny you.

Why do I sense the "Me! Me! Me!" mentality?

25.) A REAL MAN sends you flowers Just Because.

How about you kiss my arse, JUST BECAUSE?

Perhaps this list should be pasted onto the Yahoo! thread regarding women not understanding that respect is EARNED.

Talk about entitlement princesses.

LESTER BURNHAM

Re: "Real Men" Lists

permalink

Real women don't email lists of standards reflecting the narcissism of a four year old.

An Interview With Canadian Rapper: Vicious 5150

2008-11-16T22:06:00.000-08:00

Hello, Shangi Fans! I'm sitting down with my homeboy by the name of VICIOUS 5150 - who is promoting his album "V.I.C.I.O.U.S." What went down, was a pretty colourful interview with the white Canadian rapper from the little known city of Port Coquitlam, home of Terry Fox and Robert Pickton.

MADSHANGI: What's up, yo?

VICIOUS: Not much just working on tracks for my next album, "Welcome To Area 5150," which Im dropping in January.

MADSHANGI: And where can you buy this album?

VICIOUS: You can either purchase it through myself, or at Asylum Ave Recording Studio, in New Westminster, BC, located at 627 Columbia Street, plus also useful information for those who are looking for a place to record their music.

MADSHANGI: Would it also be available online, for those outside of Canada and BC?

VICIOUS: Yes, how silly of me, it's also available for purchase online at http://www.soundclick.com/asylumave

MADSHANGI: Yeah, that was silly of you. Shame on you! Shame for letting down the online fans. Well, at least I forgive you. So tell me something, V-Fitty... how would you describe your music?

VICIOUS: Please don't ever call me that again (LAUGHS)! My music to describe it, is a very versatile sound, because I basically for lack of a better term, showcase the various emotions of people, so I write whatever I'm feeling at the time.

MADSHANGI: How do you feel now?

VICIOUS: Annoyed at being called V-Fitty, I might kill you in your sleep...

MADSHANGI: How typical of a white rapper to resort to violence. And I thought I was your friend!

VICIOUS: Yea well some say that cucumbers taste better when pickled...

MADSHANGI: You come from a town called Port Coquitlam, which in the recent past came notorious for the pig farm owned by Robert Pickton. What are your two cents about those murders and the trial?

VICIOUS: Guy definitely doesn't know how to treat a woman, easily the worst first date in history.

MADSHANGI: And some people think that I have a problem with women, because of my affiliation with Antimisandry.com! I recently shared a blog with you, by a guy named Julian Real... what are your thoughts about THAT character?

VICIOUS: Well he doesn't seem like he respects a critic's opinion, and is very quick to judge just because of what he reads, but that's my opinion, maybe I'm wrong too.

MADSHANGI: You're right... he IS a fucking cocksucker. So, you once opened for Moka... or is it Moka Only? Only Moka?

VICIOUS: Yea, hes a very closeminded individual, I guess he doesn't like any other kind of coffee, and by golly he makes no bones about it. I also opened for the legendary Maestro Fresh Wes.

MADSHANGI: Who is your favorite rapper of all time?

VICIOUS: That's a tough call, I have so many favourites I couldn't choose just one

MADSHANGI: Aw, come on! Everyone's got a favorite. Are you afraid if you choose one over the others, they're going to get jealous?

VICIOUS: I'd say it's a toss up between Paris and LL Cool J.

MADSHANGI: MAMA SAID KNOCK YOU OUT!

VICIOUS: You said it, sister.

MADSHANGI: Why do you think LL's mother is so violent?

VICIOUS: Well she's not, she's clearly telling HIM to knock you out, so really, he's the violent one, she merely hands down the order.

MADSHANGI: Do you think that's typical of African-Americans?

VICIOUS: THIS INTERVIEW IS OVER!

MADSHANGI: Aw, come on. I was kidding. So what do you think is better? Kentucky Fried Chicken, or Lee's Famous Chicken?

VICIOUS: Thats a tough call, too.

MADSHANGI: Even though this is an interview about you, I'm such an egomaniac that I like to turn the conversation around to make it about me. Tell me about something that makes me sound cool.

VICIOUS: Well MadShangi is a pretty madly shangious name, wherever did you come up with it?

MADSHANGI: Hmmm, I don't know. That's a mystery even I can't solve. Out of all the tracks you recorded, do you have a personal favorite? And why?

VICIOUS: I'd have to say my song "Based On A True Story," because that song was probably the first time I really wrote something that really connected to a lot of youth everywhere in the world. The song is about a girl who was abused at home, so she had ran away from home, and ended up on the street, where she was introduced to a new lifestyle, which led her down an unfortunate path.

MADSHANGI: Of the tracks I heard... so far I like "Like This, Like That" the best.

VICIOUS: Why is that?

MADSHANGI: It's so catchy. It's got a good beat, and it sticks in my mind the most.

VICIOUS: Yea. a lot of people like that one, I frequently perform that one live at my shows.

CHECK OUT VICIOUS 5150'S MYSPACE PAGE!

Vicious 5150 and Lil Q - You Know This

I'm Being Stalked By A Radical Profeminist

2008-11-16T20:27:00.000-08:00

Good evening, Shangi Fans!

Hi, I am MadShangi and I am a bit of a celebrity in some circles. Or at least I think I'm a celebrity, otherwise why would somebody spend their time and energy stalking me. Recently I became aware of a blog called “A Radical Profeminist” that is owned and maintained by a complete waste of skin that goes by the name Julian Real.

Julian Real's great plan is to undo the vast conspiracy known as the “Patriarchy.” And he plans on doing this by posting long-winded rants against males and spouting a lot of feminist rhetoric in a completely fascist manner. Julian's rants are reminiscent of Valerie Solanas, the radical feminist best known for shooting Andy Warhol in 1968 – only strangely Valerie comes across as much manlier.

I posted a comment one of Julian's many rants, and then went on my merry way thinking nothing of it. I got a response back from him, but I ignored it... I had better things to do after all. Until recently, when I became aware that I, yours truly, became the subject of Julian's latest blog – which can be found here:

http://radicalprofeminist.blogspot.com/2008/11/more-on-myth-of-man-hating.html

A Radical Profeminist
This blog exists to challenge white heterosexual male supremacy as an institutionalized ideology and a systematized set of practices which are misogynistic, heterosexist, genocidal, and ecocidal.

(yeah, it actually says that)

I was shocked to find, that the guy had grown so obsessed with me – that he decided to do a search of my screen name and found an old MySpace page that I used to have. I hardly ever used MySpace and didn't really put much thought or energy into it, but this guy had copied and pasted things from that page, and put it into another one of his mindless rants about anti-feminists. Hey, Julian? Stalk much? I know I'm a handsome guy and all, but really, this kind of attention isn't really flattering. You kind of remind me of Kathy Bates' character from “Misery.” I wouldn't be surprised if you were a Scientologist, either.

In a way, I felt rather violated. Even though there wasn't anything on that page that was too scandalous, at least no more scandalous than what was found on Miley Cyrus' MySpace – some dream I humorously wrote about in a blog, that's about it. Oh, and you can bet your ass that this Julian Real was salivating over my dream, tapping into my subconscious, before going into a lengthy deconstruction of it. He for some reason found it worthy to note that I had “Eminem” as one of my MySpace friends. You know, 'cause Em and I are such homies. We share the same mother-hating bond, that unites us all men. It got me thinking: “How would Julian feel if some psycho happened to dig into HIS life, to fill his twisted purposes?” And so I did.

Born in 1981, Julian was an unhappy child. Tormented and teased as a child, Julian was the recipient of vicious bullying in the schoolyard for his habit of cross-dressing, and obsession with the 80's cartoon “My Pretty Pony.” His father was a baptist minister, who would sneak into his room at night to fondle him, while reading passages from the Bible about stoning disobedient children. His mother was a radical feminist, who would frequently threaten to “cut it off” if he didn't behave. Later in life, Julian was known to pace up and down the halls of his high school, rambling about a “Patriarchy” that “OPPRESSED US ALL!” which would often get Julian in trouble with the establishment. But soon, Julian found solace in hard drugs and blogging.

I truly feel sorry for the poor lad, I truly do. His obsession with me, is clearly the result of a long incubating mental illness that has plagued Julian for most of his adult life. I truly hope that he gets the help that he needs. My thoughts and prayers are with you, Julian, I hope for a speedy recovery.

God bless – MadShangi AKA Patrick Doran.